Responding to the statement,
Anneliese Dodds, the
Shadow Chancellor, accused Sunak of putting off the "big decisions" by choosing to present a statement rather than a full budget.
Keir Starmer, the
leader of the opposition
Labour Party, said the bonus scheme "should be targeted in the areas which most need it, not across the piece", while
Bridget Phillipson, Labour's
Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, wrote to
HM Revenue and Customs to ask them to publish their modelling for the job bonus scheme. The IFS also suggested that raising the stamp duty threshold would adversely affect first-time buyers, who are largely exempt from paying it, while benefiting sellers who could take advantage of the situation with higher property prices. Helen Miller, deputy director of the IFS described first-time buyers as "a group that might actually be made worse off by the policy". The warning of tax rises was echoed by
David Gauke, a former
Conservative Party minister with
HM Treasury, who said that either tax increases or spending cuts would be needed to pay off a £40bn public deficit built up during the pandemic. In a series of letters sent to the Chancellor before the statement was delivered,
Jim Harra, the director of HM Revenue and Customs, questioned whether two of the schemes announced were value for money. He raised concerns about paying companies a £1,000 bonus to retain furloughed workers, a scheme estimated to cost the Treasury £9.4bn, and whether the 50% meal discount, estimated to cost £0.5bn, was cost effective, describing both as "sound policy rationale" but the effectiveness of which would be difficult to measure. In response, the Chancellor said that action was needed to protect jobs, but admitted there would be a "dead weight" cost of the job retention bonus from firms who would have retained their staff anyway. In a BBC interview the day after delivering the statement, Sunak said that he would not be able to protect "every single job" and that the UK was entering a "severe recession". ==Aftermath==