As soon as the discovery of the specimen SGO.PV.6509 was officially revealed in 2012, the preliminary descriptions already classified it in the subfamily Tylosaurinae, but could not determine whether the latter was a representative of a new taxon or not. As the fossils are fragmentary and incomplete, almost all the
common features of the group are not present on them, making it impossible to directly assign
Kaikaifilu within the Tylosaurinae. Nevertheless, one of the features present, namely the exclusion of the frontal from the margin of the orbit, is visible in this specimen. The first
phylogenetic analysis of this specimen was performed in 2015, when the genus was still unnamed. All strict consensus methods place SGO.PV.6509 within the Tylosaurinae, but not always in the same position, the first analysis placing it in a basal position to
Taniwhasaurus spp. and the second as a
sister taxon to
Tylosaurus. In the study officially describing it, all the analyzes carried out also find it as a tylosaurine, with similar results, only the most parsimonious cladogram classifying it as the most basal of the group. The following cladogram is modified from the phylogenetic analysis conducted by Otero et al. (2017), showing the proposed placement of
Kaikaifilu within Tylosaurinae: }} As of 2019, just two years after its official description, the attribution of
Kaikaifilu to the Tylosaurinae has been questioned. The authors note that some observed characteristics do not appear to fit, or even contradict the definition of the group. In addition, the very fragmentary nature of the fossils prevents the same authors from carrying out new phylogenetic classifications with
Kaikaifilu. == Paleoecology ==