Spagnuolo audio scandal In August 2025, audio recordings were made public in the mass media in which the head of ANDIS, Diego Spagnuolo, who had also served as lawyer to President
Javier Milei, alleged acts of corruption reaching the highest levels of the executive branch. In the recordings,
Karina Milei was mentioned and accused of receiving a kickback of 3% from medications purchased by ANDIS. Other officials mentioned included
Martín Menem, president of the
Chamber of Deputies of Argentina, and Eduardo "Lule" Menem, a subordinate of Karina Milei. Spagnuolo was removed from his post at ANDIS and the government intervened in the institution. Argentine authorities seized Spagnuolo's mobile phones and carried out raids on the main pharmaceutical supplier involved, Suizo Argentina. At the same time, the existence of additional recordings allegedly involving Karina Milei was announced. The fact-checking organization
Chequeado commissioned a technical analysis from the specialized consultancy BlackVOX, which, using the
software Forensia, compared the recordings with Spagnuolo's public records on
YouTube and concluded that there was "strong evidence" of correspondence between the two voices. The national government prohibited the dissemination of the recordings and denounced an alleged international intelligence operation involving local journalists and even the governments of Russia and Venezuela. The prohibition on dissemination of the recordings was also denounced by the parliamentary opposition as a case of censorship. The audio scandal generated major national and international repercussions that affected Karina Milei's role in her brother's government.
Judicial proceedings On 21 August 2025, attorney Gregorio Dalbón filed a criminal complaint following the dissemination of the audio recordings attributed to Diego Spagnuolo. The case was assigned to Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 11, under federal judge
Sebastián Casanello, with prosecutor Franco Picardi involved in the proceedings. In that context,
searches were ordered and telephones and other electronic devices were seized. The investigation continued under seal until 18 September, when the restriction was lifted. On 1 September, federal civil and commercial judge Patricio Maraniello issued a precautionary measure ordering "the immediate cessation of the dissemination" of the recordings in which
Karina Milei was mentioned, both in the media and on social networks. The ruling held that the disclosure constituted "a serious violation of institutional privacy". On 18 September, when the seal was lifted, the parties were able to access the court file. At that stage, a report by the Directorate General for Investigations and Technological Support (DATIP) stated that Spagnuolo had deleted messages from his mobile phone and had attempted to access his WhatsApp account from another device before handing over the handset to the court. As part of the file, the prosecution incorporated the witness statement of businessman Luis Cella, who acknowledged efforts to have Prevent S.A. included as a supplier to the Incluir Salud program and described an alleged scheme of agreements among pharmaceutical distributors to fix prices and divide patients among themselves. The testimony was accompanied by emails exchanged with Diego Spagnuolo that, according to the prosecutorial filing, reflected tensions over the exclusion of the company and possible coordination among suppliers in the sector. On 18 November, official Ornella Calvete—then National Director for Regional and Sectoral Development at the
Ministry of Economy and the
government's representative on the Special Customs Area Commission—tendered her resignation after her name appeared in the case. The measure came after a search of her home in which
US$700,000 was seized, the origin of which could not be justified at that time. At the same time, her father, Miguel Ángel Calvete, identified by the prosecution as an informal intermediary with direct ties to Spagnuolo and various pharmaceutical distributors, was summoned for questioning but refused to testify before Casanello and prosecutor Picardi. The filing places him as one of the central figures in the alleged scheme, with influence over the agency's decisions and direct contact with suppliers in the sector. At this stage, prosecutor Picardi also detailed various indications that would implicate Spagnuolo, including alleged money movements linked to Calvete, an unjustified increase in wealth, the existence of undeclared foreign currency and the submission to the court of a phone with deleted information. During the search of his home, a bill-counting machine was also found, which was considered relevant to the investigation. On 19 November, Diego Spagnuolo was summoned for questioning at the federal courts in Comodoro Py. The former ANDIS director appeared before Judge Casanello and prosecutor Picardi, but refused to testify and did not answer questions, although he informally denied the acts imputed to him. His lawyer, Mauricio D'Alessandro, publicly argued that the recordings attributed to Spagnuolo had been "manipulated with artificial intelligence" and that the defense had submitted an expert report allegedly showing this, a position that will be examined in judicial proceedings. According to the prosecutorial filing, Spagnuolo played a "key" role in the alleged scheme of steering purchases, improper payments and financial maneuvers within the agency, and maintained an operational relationship with Miguel Ángel Calvete and other defendants. ==Honours==