In 2023, several individuals claimed that Jackson had blocked them on
Twitter due to their criticism of her. They filed a lawsuit, asserting that she had violated their
First Amendment rights as an elected public official. Jackson argued that one user had engaged in "hate speech", which is not protected by the First Amendment. The other critics contended that they had not resorted to personal attacks or profanity. In her response, Jackson stated, "People who are blocked should send me an email, and we’ll consider whether they should be unblocked". On August 19, 2025, U.S. District Judge
Donald Walter dismissed the case (
Detiege v. Jackson, No. 3:23-cv-00175, W.D. La.), holding that Jackson’s posts from her account did not constitute state action under
Lindke v. Freed and thus did not violate plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights. ==References==