A friend of Kaye had been granted an interlocutory
injunction preventing the editor (Anthony Robertson) and the
Sunday Sport from using the material; they appealed.
Lord Justice Glidewell said, "It is well known that in English law there is no right to privacy, and accordingly there is no right of action for breach of a person's privacy. The facts of the present case are a graphic illustration of the desirability of Parliament considering whether and in what circumstances statutory provision can be made to protect the privacy of individuals." In the absence of the right to privacy, Kaye's solicitors
Wright Webb Syrett based their claim on
libel,
malicious falsehood,
trespass to the person and
passing off. The
Court of Appeal ruled that none of these torts was applicable except malicious falsehood, and on this basis, the only remedy available was that the newspaper was prohibited from stating any inference that Kaye had consented to the story. ==See also==