Prior to excavation, tomb AC 30 appeared to be an elongated, north–south oriented mound – later confirmed to be a
mastaba – long by wide with a maximal elevation of . Indications of severe damage from stone thieving were immediately identifiable from the debris, which is typical of other tombs in the Abusir necropolis. The floor of the tomb's courtyard was covered in a layer of mud and admixture of gravel. In contrast with AC 29, AC 30 does not appear to have a lower level of mud floor. Once excavated, the mastaba was determined to be long by , with masonry preserved up to a height of . It had an offering chapel, and a vertical shaft through which the substructure was accessed. The superstructure's outer faces were built from locally quarried yellow and grey limestone joined using a mud and lime mortar. Its inner core was of mediocre quality, predominantly consisting of limestone debris, mudbrick and substantial quantities of pottery. This was encased with massive, but poor quality, rough white limestone blocks indicating that construction was abandoned after the owner's death. The superstructure is entered on the eastern façade through a wide entryway giving access to a by L-shaped offering chapel. The entrance sidewalls were built from fine quality white limestone, and the chapel originally contained two
false doors on its western wall, but stone thieves have severely damaged the chapel's masonry. The method of construction indicates the chapel was built in the latter half of the Fifth Dynasty. Overall, the tomb is smaller among the social elite and royal family tombs in Abusir. The vertical shaft, for entering the substructure, was found behind the northern false door inside the chapel. Its maximum preserved depth is , and its side walls are in a reasonable state of preservation – only the upper part of the south wall has been destroyed. Inside, a small
bḏꜣ-mould, parts of a calf, shards of pottery, charcoal, wooden fragments, and rope segments were discovered. The southern wall of the shaft contains a narrow passage long, wide and high that gives access to the burial chamber. A sloping ramp fashioned from limestone fragments, evidently used to transport the mummy into the tomb, led into the burial chamber, which measured long, wide and tall. It once had a nearly flat ceiling, but this has been destroyed. A single, massive limestone block remains
in situ in the chamber's westernmost area. Its size indicates that the tomb belonged to a royal family member. The chamber originally contained a white limestone sarcophagus in its western area, but it too has been destroyed. Remains of the burial discovered include 23 travertine model vessels, 2 white limestone lids presumably from canopic jars, 4 copper models of tools, animal bones, fragments of wooden items, bandages and cloth from the embalming process. The quality of craftsmanship on these items is high. Two types of pottery were discovered inside the tomb: those used in the core masonry of the structure to reduce construction time and expense, and those used in the practices of the mortuary cult. Skeletal fragments of the owner were recovered during excavation which identified the tomb owner as a 20 year old woman. The tomb's owner and titles were identified through the
baugraffiti found on the side walls of the chapel and shaft, the substructure pavement, and in the passage connecting the shaft and burial chamber and also includes construction dates. She was 'king's wife' (
ḥmt-nswt) and 'king's mother' (
mwt-nswt) Khentkaus (
Ḫnt-kꜣw.s). An abbreviated variant of her name Khent (
Ḫnt) was found in the space above her burial chamber, below the ceiling level. It is improbable that these blocks originated from the
Pyramid of Khentkaus II, as the titles on the blocks are uniform, unlike those of Khentkaus II's. There are also no such blocks present in the other nearby tombs of AC 25 and AC 29. The tomb's proximity to
Neferefre's unfinished pyramid suggests a spousal relationship. Significantly, that she was a 'king's mother' indicates that her progeny succeeded to the Egyptian throne. This king is not named in the epigraphy of her tomb, but is probably either
Menkauhor or the ephemeral
Shepseskare. == References ==