Box office Kingsman: The Secret Service grossed $414.4million worldwide; $24.2million of the takings were generated from the UK market and $128.3million from North America.
Kingsman opened on 30 January 2015 in the UK, Sweden, Ireland and Malta. In the UK the film opened with $6.5 million and debuted at second place (behind
Big Hero 6). The following weekend it opened in two additional countries:
Australia and
New Zealand. It debuted atop the box office in both countries and had a successful opening in Australia with $3.6 million. In its third weekend, it earned $23 million from 4,844 screens in 39 countries. It topped the box office in three countries: Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand, the rest of which were dominated by
Fifty Shades of Grey. In its fourth weekend, it expanded to a total of 54 countries and grossed $33.4 million from 5,940 screens. Its biggest opener outside of North America was in
China, where it earned $27.9 million. Other high openings occurred in
South Korea ($5.3 million) The film opened in 3,204 cinemas and grossed $10.4 million on its first day, $15.4 million on its second day and $10.4 million on its third day, for a weekend gross of $36.2 million (an $11,300-per-cinema average), finishing second at the box office behind
Fifty Shades of Grey. During the four-day
Presidents Day weekend it grossed $41.8 million.
Critical response The
review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes sampled 264 critics and judged 75% of the reviews positive, with an average rating of 6.8/10, calling the film "Stylish, subversive, and above all fun,
Kingsman: The Secret Service finds director Matthew Vaughn sending up the spy genre with gleeful abandon." On
Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 60 out of 100, based on 50 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews. The
Movie Review Query Engine (MRQE) rates the film at 63 out of 100, based on 108 film critic reviews. Audiences polled by
CinemaScore, gave the film a grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.
Peter Travers of
Rolling Stone said of the film, "This slam-bang action movie about British secret agents is deliriously shaken, not stirred... Even when it stops making sense, Kingsman is unstoppable fun". Jordan Hoffman, writing for
The Guardian, said of the film, "The spirit of 007 is all over this movie, but Vaughn's script... has a licence to poke fun.... no one involved in the production can believe they're getting away with making such a batshit Bond." Comparing the film to those of
Christopher Nolan, Hoffman said, "Despite the presence of grandfatherly Michael Caine, Kingsman's tone is about as far from the Christopher Nolan-style superhero film as you can get. Verisimilitude is frequently traded in for a rich laugh".
Peter Bradshaw, writing for
The Guardian, called the film "a smirking spy spoof, weirdly charmless and dated in unintentional ways", commenting that "it is a film forever demanding to be congratulated on how 'stylish' it is." Some reviewers were critical of the film's depiction of violence, which was considered to be too graphic for a comedy. Anthony Lane of
The New Yorker stated, "Few recent movies have fetched quite as far as
Kingsman, and countless viewers will relish the brazen zest of its invention." However, Lane was critical of the film's use of stereotypes. Manohla Dargis of
The New York Times enjoyed the film, but criticised Vaughn's use of violence as a cinematic tool, calling it "narrative overkill". Jason Ward of
The Guardian wrote that "[e]verything about Kingsman exists to disguise the fact that it is solidly conservative". His examples include "[t]he depiction of Valentine's plan as a throwback to a less serious era of spy movies [which] is revealed as a feint, with the ulterior motive of undermining environmentalists". Likewise,
The A.V. Clubs Ignatiy Vishnevetsky commented that, "Far from being a
Team America-style send-up of
gentleman spy movies,
Kingsman is actually even more reactionary than the movies it's referencing; it traffics in the kind of Tory values Bond flicks merely suggest... the thing is, the movie
is fun, at least from a visual design standpoint, even though it's hard to separate its bespoke fashions, future-vintage gadgets, and aristocratic décor from its fusty worldview". Peter Sobczynski of
RogerEbert.com, who gave the film two out of four stars, likened Vaughn's script to the spy film equivalent of
Scream and also criticised the overuse of graphic violence, despite its cartoonish rendering.
Accolades == Sequels ==