Response from TVA and government officials The day after the spill, TVA released a statement acknowledging the spill and apologizing for its damage to nearby homes. Tennessee Governor
Phil Bredesen toured the spill site on December 31. The
United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, which oversees the TVA, held a hearing on January 8 to examine the disaster. Environmental activist
Erin Brockovich visited the site on January 8 and spoke with residents affected by the spill.
Water quality and efforts to stop the spill Immediately after the spill, the EPA and
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) began testing the water quality of the area affected by the spill. The day after the spill
Tennessee Emergency Management Agency indicated that barriers would be constructed to stop the ash from reaching the Tennessee River. By December 30 the TVA had announced it was requesting the assistance of the
Army Corps of Engineers to
dredge the ash-filled Emory River to restore navigation. On January 1 the TVA announced that rather than attempting to clear away all of the slurry, they would be spraying seed, straw, and mulch on top of much of it to prevent dust scattering and erosion. In response to independent attempts at sampling of the water quality and the taking of photos, the TVA illegally detained, for approximately one hour, two members of the Knoxville-based environmental organization United Mountain Defense who were traversing public land in the area of the spill and warned three other individuals that any attempt to enter the public waterway would lead to prosecution. On December 26 TDEC stated that it was satisfied with the water quality in the wake of the spill but that it would continue to examine and deal with the potential for chronic health effects.
Coal ash issues The spill immediately reignited the debate about the regulation of coal ash. In response to a video that showed dead fish on the Clinch River, which had received
runoff from the spill, Francis stated "in terms of toxicity, until an analysis comes in, you can't call it toxic." He continued by saying that "it does have some
heavy metals within it, but it's not toxic or anything." Lisa Evans, an attorney for the environmental group
Earthjustice, spoke out against the government, accusing them of lax regulations on the issue. She also blamed the
electric power and coal industries for ineffective safeguards, citing other similar cases. She stated the issue of proper disposal of coal ash is not an extremely complicated problem and that utilities know how to solve it. Thomas J. FitzGerald, the director of the environmental group Kentucky Resources Council and an expert on coal waste, reported that the ash should have been buried in
lined landfills to prevent toxins leaching into the soil and groundwater, as recommended in a 2006 EPA report, and stated that he found it hard to believe that the state of Tennessee would have approved the ash disposal sites at the plant as a permanent disposal site. The TVA released an inventory of the plant's byproducts on December 29; it included arsenic, lead, barium, chromium, and
manganese. Because the pond contained decades worth of ash from coal of several different types, it was believed that the area of the spill may have contained isolated patches of higher toxicity. Also on January 14
Nick J. Rahall, a U.S. Representative from
West Virginia and the chairman of the
United States House Committee on Natural Resources, introduced a bill to regulate coal ash disposal sites across the United States. That year, TVA committed to switching all of the ash storage facilities at their coal-fired plants over to dry byproduct methods, which would reduce the chances of another spill. This was completed by 2022 at a cost of $2 billion. At the time of the spill, five TVA-operated plants used this method, while Kingston and another five used a wet process with ponds. Some of the provisions in the 2015 CCR regulation were challenged in litigation, and the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded certain portions of the regulation to EPA for further rulemaking. The EPA published a final CCR "Part A" regulation on August 28, 2020, requiring all unlined ash ponds to retrofit with liners or close by April 11, 2021. Some facilities may apply to obtain additional time—up to 2028—to find alternatives for managing ash wastes before closing their surface impoundments. EPA published its "CCR Part B" rule on November 12, 2020, which allows certain facilities to use an alternative liner, based on a demonstration that human health and the environment will not be affected. Pursuant to the CCR Part B regulation, several facilities applied, within a December 14, 2020 deadline, for alternate liner demonstrations. Some of those applications were subsequently withdrawn, and in 2023 EPA proposed to deny six of the remaining applications. In January 2025 EPA denied the application for the Coronado Generating Station in Arizona, but in February 2026 announced that it will consider an approval for the facility, based on new information. As of early 2026 EPA has not made final determinations on other applications. ==Cleanup==