Lack of source attribution By May 2016, knowledge boxes were appearing for "roughly one-third" of the 100 billion monthly searches the company processed. Also in 2014,
The Daily Dot noted that "Wikipedia still has no real competitor as far as actual content is concerned. All that's up for grabs are traffic stats. And as a nonprofit, traffic numbers don't equate into revenue in the same way they do for a commercial media site". After the article's publication, a spokesperson for the
Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, stated that it "welcomes" the knowledge panel functionality, that it was "looking into" the traffic drops, and that "We've also not noticed a significant drop in search engine referrals. We also have a continuing dialog with staff from Google working on the Knowledge Panel". In his 2020 book,
Dariusz Jemielniak noted that as most Google users do not realize that many answers to their questions that appear in the Knowledge Graph come from Wikipedia, this reduces Wikipedia's popularity, and in turn limited the site's ability to raise new funds and attract new volunteers.
Bias The algorithm has been criticized for presenting biased or inaccurate information, usually because of sourcing information from websites with high
search engine optimization. It had been noted in 2014 that while there was a Knowledge Graph for most major historical or pseudo-historical
religious figures such as
Moses,
Muhammad and
Gautama Buddha, there was none for
Jesus, the central figure of
Christianity. On June 3, 2021, a knowledge box identified
Kannada as the ugliest language in India, prompting outrage from the Kannada-language community; the state of
Karnataka, where most Kannada speakers live, also threatened to sue Google for damaging the public image of the language. Google promptly changed the featured snippet for the search query and issued a formal apology. == See also ==