The memorandum was presented in mid-November 2003 by
Russia, as a detailed proposal for a united
asymmetric federal Moldavian state. First published in Russian on the website of Transnistria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the text was promoted by a Russian politician
Dmitry Kozak, a close ally of President
Vladimir Putin and one of the key figures in his presidential team. For Transnistria, the memorandum presented an end to the previous Moscow policy, which assumed that the region would have equal status in federation with the rest of the country.
Memorandum terms Some of the terms of the memorandum included: as all organic laws would need the assent of the Senate, while the Senate's composition granted disproportionate representation relative to population size, as by 2004, Transnistria and
Gagauzia made up only 18% of Moldova's total population, giving Transnistria effective veto power over Moldovan politics and legislation. The subjects of the Federation had the right to secede from the Federation only in the case of the decision to accede to another State, or in connection with the complete loss of its sovereignty by the Federation. The withdrawal of the Subject of the Federation from the Federation was to be carried out on the basis of decisions taken at a national referendum of the Subject of the Federation appointed by the legislative body of the state power of the Subject of the Federation in the presence of grounds for withdrawal. The Federation was to hold sole authority over core national matters, such as: • Federal state property and management; • Currency regulation and monetary emission; • Air, rail, and water transport; • Foreign policy, foreign trade, international treaties, and issues of war and peace; The subjects of the Federation were to exercise authority over matters not assigned to the Federation, including: • Regulation of foreign economic activity within their powers and using own funds; • Establishment of their own systems of public authorities; • Administrative legislation concerning their own authorities; • Local self-government and related guarantees;
Reactions Vladimir Voronin, the president of Moldova, has initially been quoted as giving qualified support for the proposal, reportedly saying that the “Moldovan society will succeed in finding the optimal solution after studying, discussion and improvement of this document”. However, later in 2005, he made a statement rejecting the memorandum because of contradiction with the Moldovan constitution, which defines Moldova as a neutral state that could not allow any foreign troops on its soil, or join military alliances. President of Transnistria,
Igor Smirnov, has characterized the document as a compromise able to normalize relations between Moldova and Transnistria, further asking for a Treaty providing a Russian military deployment in Moldova for 30 years, not mentioned in the proposal. The Moldovan public vehemently rejected the Kozak Memorandum. In the days following the publication of the Russian proposal, large demonstrations against the Kozak memorandum took place in
Chișinău. Moldova's leadership declined to sign the memorandum without coordination with the European organizations. Moldova and the Kozak memorandum was a key issue at the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe ministerial meeting in
Maastricht in December 2003, and disagreement between Russia on the one hand, and the EU and the US on the other on Moldova, was one of the principal reasons why a final joint declaration was not adopted after the meeting. After the failure of the signing of the Memorandum, relations between Transnistria and Moldova deteriorated Negotiations resumed only in 2005 within the framework of the regional organization
GUAM on the basis of proposals submitted by the Ukrainian President
Viktor Yushchenko. == References ==