The Lantau Tomorrow Vision met fierce opposition immediately after its publication.
Roy Tam Hoi-pong of the environmental group Green Sense expressed his worry that the project would drain the city's coffers, estimating it could cost up to HK$1 trillion (US$128.2 billion), almost all of Hong Kong's fiscal reserves. Former
Hong Kong Observatory director
Lam Chiu Ying warned that the reclaimed area would be vulnerable to rising sea levels and extreme weather due to
climate change. Authorities began a 3-month public consultation on 29 December 2022, but did not make an announcement; instead, media discovered that the public consultation had started. In February 2023, the government hosted a closed-door "briefing" over the project; 11 environmental groups refused to attend, saying the government's consultation period was "the sneakiest in history" due to it not being announced. In February 2023, after a report by
Greenpeace and
Liber Research Community listed risks with the project, the Development Bureau said "We call on them not to obstruct Hong Kong’s development with alarmist and fallacious remarks." In March 2023, the government announced that the
Belcher Bay Promenade, opened in phases starting from 2019, could be closed for five years in order to build a road to the project. In March 2023,
Regina Ip said that the
Northern Metropolis project should be prioritised over Lantau Tomorrow Vision;
John Lee then responded by saying both projects would move ahead simultaneously without the need to prioritise one over the other. In April 2023, a survey showed that only 6% of Hongkongers supported Lee's idea to build both simultaneously. In April 2023,
Greenpeace said that the government had misled citizens on its "public consultation," as only 1 of 33 briefing sessions by the government had participation from the public. In August 2023, experts warned that the government would be unlikely to generate its projected income of HK$85 billion from land sales. An editorial in
The Standard newspaper in December 2023 suggested the government might have lost interest in the project. ==See also==