Patient position During the laparoscopic procedure, the position of the patient is either in
Trendelenburg position or in reverse Trendelenburg. These positions have an effect on cardiopulmonary function. In Trendelenburg's position, there is an increased
preload due to an increase in the venous return from lower extremities. This position results in cephalic shifting of the viscera, which accentuates the pressure on the diaphragm. In the case of reverse Trendelenburg position, pulmonary function tends to improve as there is a caudal shifting of viscera, which improves tidal volume by a decrease in the pressure on the diaphragm. This position also decreases the preload on the heart and causes a decrease in the venous return leading to hypotension. The pooling of blood in the lower extremities increases the stasis and predisposes the patient to develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT). will be sufficient to perform a laparoscopic removal of a
gallbladder. Since the gallbladder is similar to a small balloon that stores and releases bile, it can usually be removed from the abdomen by suctioning out the bile and then removing the deflated gallbladder through the 1 cm incision at the patient's navel. The length of postoperative stay in the hospital is minimal, and most patients can be safely discharged from the hospital the same day.
Colon and kidney In certain advanced laparoscopic procedures, where the specimen removed is too large to pull through a trocar site (as is done with gallbladders), an incision larger than 10 mm must be made. The most common of these procedures are removal of all or part of the colon (
colectomy), or removal of the kidney (
nephrectomy). Some surgeons perform these procedures completely laparoscopically, making the larger incision toward the end of the procedure for specimen removal, or, in the case of a colectomy, to also prepare the remaining healthy bowel to be reconnected (create an
anastomosis). Many other surgeons feel that since they will have to make a larger incision for specimen removal anyway, they might as well use this incision to have their hand in the operative field during the procedure to aid as a retractor, dissector, and to be able to feel differing tissue densities (palpate), as they would in open surgery. This technique is called hand-assist laparoscopy. Since they will still be working with scopes and other laparoscopic instruments, CO2 will have to be maintained in the patient's abdomen, so a device known as a hand access port (a sleeve with a seal that allows passage of the hand) must be used. Surgeons who choose this hand-assist technique feel it reduces operative time significantly versus the straight laparoscopic approach. It also gives them more options in dealing with unexpected adverse events (e.g., uncontrolled bleeding) that may otherwise require creating a much larger incision and converting to a fully open surgical procedure. Conceptually, the laparoscopic approach is intended to minimise post-operative
pain and speed up recovery times, while maintaining an enhanced visual field for surgeons. Due to improved patient outcomes in the early 21st century, laparoscopic surgery has been adopted by various surgical sub-specialties, including gastrointestinal surgery (including bariatric procedures for
morbid obesity), gynecologic surgery, and urology. Based on numerous prospective
randomized controlled trials, the approach has proven to be beneficial in reducing post-operative morbidities such as wound infections and incisional
hernias (especially in morbidly obese patients), and is now deemed safe when applied to surgery for cancers such as cancer of colon. The restricted vision, the difficulty in handling of the instruments (new hand-eye coordination skills are needed), the lack of tactile perception, and the limited working area are factors adding to the technical complexity of this surgical approach. For these reasons, minimally invasive surgery has emerged as a highly competitive new sub-specialty within various fields of surgery. Surgical residents who wish to focus on this area of surgery gain additional laparoscopic surgery training during one or two years of fellowship after completing their basic surgical residency. In OB-GYN residency programs, the average laparoscopy-to-laparotomy quotient (LPQ) is 0.55.
In veterinary medicine Laparoscopic techniques have also been developed in the field of
veterinary medicine. Due to the relatively high cost of the equipment required, it has not become commonplace in most traditional practices today but rather limited to specialty practices. Many of the same surgeries performed in humans can be applied to animal cases – everything from an egg-bound tortoise to a German Shepherd can benefit from MIS. A paper published in JAVMA (Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association) in 2005 showed that dogs spayed laparoscopically experienced significantly less pain (65%) than those that were spayed with traditional "open" methods.
Arthroscopy, thoracoscopy, and cystoscopy are all performed in veterinary medicine today.
Advantages There are a number of advantages to the patient with laparoscopic surgery versus an open procedure. These include: • Reduced
hemorrhaging, which reduces the chance of needing a
blood transfusion. • Smaller incision, which reduces pain and shortens recovery time, as well as resulting in less post-operative scarring. • Less pain, leading to less
pain medication needed. • Although procedure times are usually slightly longer, hospital stay is less, and often with a same day discharge which leads to a faster return to everyday living. • Reduced exposure of internal organs to possible external contaminants, thereby reduced risk of acquiring infections. Benefits of laparoscopy appear to recede with younger age. Efficacy of laparoscopy is inferior to open surgery in certain conditions such as
pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic
pyloric stenosis. Although laparoscopic
appendectomy has less wound problems than open surgery, the former is associated with more intra-abdominal
abscesses.
Disadvantages While laparoscopic surgery is clearly advantageous in terms of patient outcomes, the procedure is more difficult from the surgeon's perspective when compared to conventional, open surgery: • Laparoscopic surgery requires
pneumoperitoneum for adequate visualization and operative manipulation. • The surgeon has a limited range of motion at the surgical site, resulting in a loss of dexterity. • Poor depth perception. • The tool endpoints move in the opposite direction to the surgeon's hands due to the pivot point, making laparoscopic surgery a non-intuitive motor skill that is difficult to learn. This is called the
fulcrum effect. • Some surgeries (carpal tunnel for instance) generally turn out better for the patient when the area can be opened up, allowing the surgeon to see the surrounding physiology, to better address the issue at hand. In this regard, keyhole surgery can be a disadvantage. ==Risks==