The Laysan honeycreeper was first recorded on
Laysan Island on April 3, 1828, by C. Isenbeck, surgeon of the Russian ship
Moller, which was visiting the
Hawaiian Islands (then called the Sandwich Islands, and the expedition called Laysan "Moller"). His report was published in an 1834 article by the German
naturalist Heinrich von Kittlitz. Isenbeck referred to a "red bird" and a "
humming bird" ("" in German), in both cases probably referring to the honeycreeper, the latter due to it feeding on
nectar. From 1893 to 1900, Rothschild published a three-part
monograph on the birds of Laysan, with further observations about the honeycreeper, which he referred to as the "Laysan honey-eater". Though some related green species had previously also been considered part of the genus
Himatione, he agreed with the American zoologist
Robert C. L. Perkins that those should be moved to
Chlorodrepanis, and restricted
Himatione to the red species: the ʻapapane and the Laysan honeycreeper. By this time, Rothschild had realized that he had misspelled Freeth's name, and attempted to
emend the spelling to
freethi, but also used the spellings
fraithi and
freethii in sections of the work. The German zoologist
Hugo H. Schauinsland used the spelling
frethii in 1899. This classification was followed by most other taxonomists and the
trinomial name was used throughout the 20th century. In 1950, the American ornithologist
Dean Amadon considered the spelling
fraithii to be a ('slip of the pen', or misspelling), and justified using
freethii instead, since Rothschild later corrected the name to that. In 2005, the American ornithologist
Harold D. Pratt also indicated that the name had been corrected within the original description. In 2015 the AOU implemented these propositions in their checklist. The changes were also adopted by the
International Ornithological Committee in their world list of birds the same year. There are at least 105 known specimens (six of them mounted) of the Laysan honeycreeper in museums across the world, but two specimens appear to have gone missing. Some museums have multiple specimens, including 24 in the
Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum in
Honolulu, 20 (including the type specimen) in the
American Museum of Natural History in
New York City, and 20 in the
National Museum of Natural History in
Washington, D.C. There are also at least two skeletons, three
nests, and one
egg preserved. The known specimens were collected between 1892 and 1913. The
ratio of males to females between adult specimens in museum collections is 1.7:1. Amadon noted in 1950 that although the
Laysan finch (
Telespiza cantans) and the Laysan honeycreeper spent more time on the ground than their relatives, their power of flight was seemingly not reduced. He pointed out that the length of their wings was rather short, which perhaps indicated a beginning tendency in such a direction. The wing of the finch is shorter, perhaps because it had reached Laysan earlier than the honeycreeper. The American ornithologists
Storrs L. Olson and
Helen F. James considered the Laysan honeycreeper a distinct species from the ʻapapane in 1982, but without elaboration. Olson and the American ornithologist Alan C. Ziegler stated in 1995 that while the Laysan honeycreeper was often considered a subspecies of ʻapapane, its skull features indicate it was distinct and probably more primitive, and therefore perhaps a remnant of an earlier evolutionary stage rather than being particularly specialized for the conditions on Laysan. They speculated that if this bird could survive on Laysan, there could also be a
niche for a relative on the nearby island of
Nīhoa. They also argued that Hawaiian honeycreepers are not actually an upland group, but that this perception of them as such comes from them having been wiped out from lowland areas of Hawaii in prehistoric times by human-made
habitat destruction, and that many fossils of the group (including of
Himatione) have been found in areas just above sea level. They therefore disagreed with the idea that the species found there were a remnant of upland populations or necessarily ancient occupants. Pratt and the American biologist Thane K. Pratt stated in 2001 that due to its distinct physical features, the Laysan honeycreeper was unquestionably distinct from the ʻapapane following the
phylogenetic species concept. They added that potential isolating mechanisms included its distinct
song, feeding and nesting behavior, and its very different habitat. They found it very unlikely that the two birds would have been able to interbreed, let alone freely, and considered it likely that future researchers would split them. , the closest relative of the Laysan honeycreeper }} }} The Hawaiian honeycreepers, variously considered to constitute the family Drepanididae (formerly spelled "
Drepanidae" or "Drepaniidae", a name that turned out to be
nomenclaturally unavailable, because it was
preoccupied by a family of
moths Since the ʻapapane had been found to be the sister taxon of the
ʻākohekohe (
Palmeria dolei) by some studies, Pratt suggested in 2014 that their genera
Himatione and
Palmeria might be merged. ==Description==