Within weeks of the battle, it began to be compared to the Greek stand at the
Battle of Thermopylae. Efforts to preserve the Alamo have largely been an Anglo-American cause. The first major calls to restore parts of the Alamo occurred after 1860, as English-speaking settlers began to outnumber those of Mexican heritage. Likewise, according to Schoelwer, within "the development of Alamo imagery has been an almost exclusively American endeavor" that focuses on the Texian defenders, with less emphasis given to the Mexican Army or the Tejano soldiers who served in the Texian Army. Many Tejanos viewed the Alamo as more than just a battle site, but they or their ancestors had experienced the benefits of the Alamo compound when it served as a mission, a hospital, or a military post. Americans had arrived in Texas much later, when the Alamo no longer served in those roles, and they tended to see the compound solely in relation to the battle. According to the author Richard R. Flores, in the early 20th century, the Alamo was perceived by many in the majority white population of Texas as a symbol of
white supremacy over the minority Mexican population. That symbolism followed the late-19th-century and the early-20th-century development of a new capitalist system in Texas that placed whites at the top of the social ladder as profit-earners and Mexicans at the bottom of the social ladder as wage-earners. In Mexico, perceptions of the battle have often mirrored those of Santa Anna. Initially, reports of the Mexican victory concentrated on glorifying Santa Anna, especially among newspapers that supported the centralist cause. Typical headlines included, "Immortal Glory to the Illustrious General Santa Anna: Eternal Praise to the Invincible Army of Mexico". Within days of the news, people began composing patriotic marching songs about Santa Anna and his victory at the Alamo. Santa Anna's political opponents were displeased that the focus had shifted to him; within days, newspapers supporting the federalist viewpoint began questioning whether the victory had come at too great a cost and whether it would actually help Mexico. Many of the newspapers were disenchanted with Santa Anna's deployment of General
Martin Perfecto de Cos, who had been paroled back to Mexico after the
Siege of Bexar if he no longer took up arms against
Texians. On April 27, 1836, Mexican Secretary of War
José María Tornel announced that Mexican soldiers who participated in the campaign to retake Texas would be eligible to receive a special medal. To commemorate the Battle of the Alamo, the establishment date for the program was retroactively set to March 6, 1836. Within weeks, however, the Mexican government learned of Santa Anna's defeat and capture at the
Battle of San Jacinto and so the medal program was immediately cancelled. The Texas campaign, including the Battle of the Alamo, was soon overshadowed by the
Mexican–American War of the 1840s. Those and other similar remarks prompted a strong anti-Alamo backlash in the United States. The
New York Times editorialized, "If Americans must remember the Alamo, let's remember that gallant men died needlessly in that old mission and that their sacrifice led eventually to a war that reflects little credit on the United States.... To persevere in folly is no virtue. To dare to retreat from error can be the highest form of courage." In the late 1960s and the early 1970s, numerous anti-war protests were held on the grounds of the Alamo. with
Bryan Burrough and Chris Tomlinson co-sponsored by
Writers' League of Texas with the
Bullock Texas State History Museum, included the development of the Alamo's
mythos during the
Jim Crow era. It was canceled four hours before the program time by
Republican Lieutenant-Governor
Dan Patrick: “As a member of the
Preservation Board, I told staff to cancel this event as soon as I found out about it,” he wrote on
Twitter. ”This fact-free rewriting of TX history has no place @BullockMuseum.” The book received mostly positive reviews, including from
The Wall Street Journal and
The Washington Post, with a consensus that it builds on widely accepted academic research. The third author,
Jason Stanford, wrote one of the myths about the Alamo "leaves... out that
Texians opposed Mexican laws that would free the enslaved workers they needed to farm cotton." That censorship is occurring when Texas
conservatives, like those across the country, are against the teaching of
critical race theory which the book represents. ==Alamo Mission==