Kamin's most well-known contribution to learning theory was his discovery and analysis of the "
blocking effect" (1969). He showed that conditioning an animal to associate a salient conditioned stimulus (CSb), such as a bright light, with a salient unconditioned stimulus (US), like a shock, is "blocked" when CSb is presented simultaneously with another conditioned stimulus (CSa) that was already conditioned to the US. (Kamin used rats in most of his research, but the effect has been found in many animals). As department chair at Princeton and then Northeastern, Kamin’s achievements included the creation of programs to recruit and support graduate students of color. Kamin co-authored the controversial book
Not in Our Genes (1984) with geneticist
Richard Lewontin and neurobiologist
Steven Rose. This book attacked
E. O Wilson's sociobiology and
evolutionary psychology. Kamin was known in some circles for his speculation that the heritability of IQ could be "zero". (Mackintosh, 1998) In 1983, he was named a
Guggenheim Fellow in psychology. He was honorary professor of psychology at the
University of Cape Town in
South Africa.
Burt affair In March 1972 an invitation from the Princeton Psychology Department (which Kamin chaired at the time) to
Richard Herrnstein (who had a few months earlier published a contentious article about race, gender, class, and intelligence) sparked controversy and threats of protest. Herrnstein canceled his visit, saying that "It would be enough for me not to come if they had placards on the wall." Kamin defended the invitation to Herrnstein, opposed the protests, and organized a meeting to discuss the controversy. The resulting debates spurred Kamin to start investigating the work on
heritability of intelligence of
Cyril Burt, work that Herrnstein was citing to support his views. Kamin concluded with the assertion that Burt had falsified his data. In 1974 he published his findings about Burt in the book
The Science and Politics of IQ.
Blocking effect controversy He himself was also subject to some controversy. Maes and colleagues reported fifteen experiments that attempted to replicate the blocking effect. None of them succeeded despite using procedures well-established in previous literature. They argue that
publication bias may have produced a false confidence in the robustness of the effect. However, Soto (2018) has questioned this conclusion arguing that they come as a consequence of the type of stimuli used in these studies, and shows how contemporary models of associative learning can predict these results on the basis of this observation. == Bibliography ==