Describing the
Liveship Traders as his favorite work by Hobb, author
Orson Scott Card felt that she "arguably set the standard for the modern serious fantasy novel". A similar sentiment was expressed by
Booklist, who regarded the series as "probably the best fantasy trilogy of the past decade and a prospective fantasy classic", and
Publishers Weekly likewise held that it was "one of the finest fantasy sagas to bridge the millennium". In a survey of Hobb's writing under both pseudonyms up to 2006, critic
Don D'Ammassa called the
Liveship Traders "certainly her best work to date", and
The Weekend Australian echoed this view in 2009. Praise was directed at Hobb's construction and development of characters over the course of the series.
Interzone Chris Gilmore lauded how Hobb's characters "come alive" with a mix of strengths and human flaws, in a way that made the reader "care for them", even the wooden liveships. He praised the conflict between Kennit and his mate in
Ship of Magic as "the finest aspect of an exceptional book".
Strange Horizons Stephanie Dray similarly wrote that Kennit was "one of the most captivating villains of all time". Remarking on the "striking portraits of three generations of women" in the
Liveship Traders, the
New Statesman wrote that Hobb's novels did not ignore women's stories. Dray also praised Hobb's characterization of women, and described the series as "revolutionary nautical fantasy". The plot of the trilogy was described by D'Ammassa as "engaging and exciting" due to the way it explored the "ramifications of the setting". Gilmore felt that the first book's "complex but tightly controlled" plot was driven by the character's motivations in a way that made it highly believable. He however found the ending abrupt and summed up the first book as "rich, complex, unfinished". In a more negative review,
Kirkus faulted Hobb for yielding to "Doorstopper Syndrome"; they also felt
Ship of Magic failed due to "bloat, irresolution, logorrhea, and brake failure".
Kirkus went on to criticize the second book as having "cast aside any remaining inclination toward control", while Gilmore conversely found it constructed with "exceptional skill, deployed on a grand scale but without longueurs". ==References==