2010.
Associated Press reporter Alan Scher Zagier discovered three letters involving prosecutor
Keneth Hulshof, Judge Lewis and Lyndel Robertson. A September 24 Letter from Robertson to Lewis asking him to push aside County Prosecutor Doug Roberts. One letter from County Prosecutor Doug Roberts where he stated Robertson was at first adamant that another be charged with the crime. In another letter, Lyndel said that justice would not be served until evidence against Mark was brought to a grand jury. St. Louis attorney Robert Ramsey took up the case and uncovered police reports showing that after the shooting, Rochelle had reported that Thomure had violated a protection order barring him from contacting her. Gaining access to the case file and building a web presence with Road To Chillicothe, and other web platforms, Sale began outlining the case and gaining followers. Putting an emphasis on the obvious and bizarre lack of
chain of custody of the bullet evidence. Critical evidence that was just handed to a private eye who judge Oxenhandler had deemed not credible. A bullet removed in a surgery, just given to Robertson's unlicensed PI, Terry Deister along with the Woodworth gun he was trying to match it to; evidence Deister then flew to England and gave to a forensics person he arranged. Sale asked the question to the public, if there was no chain of custody of the original bullet from the surgery, what guarantee was there that someone in the chain had not made a new bullet from the woodworth gun? Todd Frankel of the St. Louis Post wrote: “Early on, he pushed a theory that the bullet tied by ballistic tests to a handgun owned by the Woodworth family also had been planted — or at least swapped out. Then, last year, a judge barred this same ballistic evidence from a third trial, finding “egregious, flagrant, cavalier disregard for evidentiary procedures and processes. The court didn’t go nearly as far as Sale in calling it faked. But, in many eyes, it was close enough. The evidence was tossed, and an appellate court agreed with the call." Though eventually an expert would testify that the bullet that came back from England was not the same in his eyes as one described by the doctor when it was removed. Sale also questioned why the officers had not photographed the box of bullets on the bench when they found it, or why there was no report from Miller of dusting the box. A video was shot the morning after the murder of the entire crime scene, including the machine shed and the bench, but showed no boxes on the workbench. With Kelley Berkel of Ramsey's office, they obtained a photo used at the first trial, where the saw that officer Miller had drawn a box on a still photo taken from the video of the workbench. Drawn it on with a felt tip pen. At the hearing before the master, a Linn County sheriff's deputy testified that Deputy Paul Frey told him that he, not Deputy Miller, had lifted the fingerprints from the box of bullets. This testimony only added more questions about the fingerprint that was said to be found on the box of bullets that matched Mark's. ==Mark Woodworth's conviction overturned again==