Sans Everything and its reception (1967) AEGIS published
Sans Everything in 1967. Chapters by nurses and social workers, together with Robb's 'Diary of a Nobody', described inhumane and inadequate care in long-stay wards in seven hospitals. Wards were over-crowded and under-staffed. Undignified and unkind practices included rough handling, teasing, slapping, swearing at patients and rushed 'production-line' bathing of over 40 elderly and frail patients in a single morning. There was little, if any, privacy, including for personal care. Bed time could be as early as 5pm. Some wards were locked and unstaffed at night, with senior staff disregarding the risks, for example, of fire. There was lack of medical attention, and usually no attempt at
rehabilitation. The practices often evolved from attempts to devise time-saving methods to get through the workload and manage large numbers of patients in overcrowded environments, or were due to ignorance of modern psychiatric and
geriatric treatment and care. A
stereotypic understanding of inevitable and hopeless chronic decline in old age pervaded and contributed to staff negativity. Staff who complained or wanted to change practices were accused of being disloyal, and could be victimized to the point of resigning or being dismissed from their posts. The book proposed remedies, including specialist psychiatric services to treat, rehabilitate and support mentally unwell older people, based on the model practised at
Severalls Hospital in
Colchester, which prevented admission and enabled discharge; building homes for rent on surplus land around the psychiatric hospitals to generate income for the NHS to pay for better services and accommodation for older people; and ways of monitoring, to ensure high standards, through improved NHS complaints procedures, a hospital ombudsman and an inspectorate. Discussion at the Ministry did not lead to action. Throughout AEGIS' campaign, responses from health service staff, politicians, patients and their relatives, the media and the wider public ranged from absolute endorsement of the allegations of bad practice, such as by the press and most relatives of patients, to absolute rejection, most apparent in higher tiers of NHS administration. AEGIS struggled to convince the Ministry of Health and the
regional hospital boards (RHBs), which managed the hospitals, about the happenings in them. Robinson publicly criticized the book, and announced on the BBC television news programme
24 Hours that he was sure poor care was almost non-existent and that investigations would demonstrate that. The press criticized Robinson, "who to his shame, seemed to pooh-pooh" the allegations. These included: discrediting
Sans Everything evidence as false, unreliable or exaggerated, based on their assessment of the witnesses' personality; using leading questions; accepting that practices were correct because that was how they were always done; and justifying their decisions based on comments by senior staff, who they were judging, rather than using independent sources about best psychiatric and geriatric practice. The committees demonstrated their assumptions, about the excellence of nursing care and that the NHS was "the best health service in the world", and they held excessively negative ideas about older people and mental illness. They appeared unaware of the rigid and self-defensive administrative and nursing hierarchies in the psychiatric hospitals, and that complainants could be victimised. The committees lacked professional experience of investigating government appointed boards which had neglected their responsibilities to the detriment of the population they served (such as at
Aberfan in 1966). Some committees ignored, or were unaware of, current guidance about NHS complaints management. The Council on Tribunals, the public body set up to ensure fair inquiries, criticized Robinson's handling of the
Sans Everything allegations. The inquiries made 48 general recommendations, but did not uphold the specific allegations. Robinson published the inquiry reports as a
white paper and announced in the
House of Commons that the allegations were "totally unfounded or grossly exaggerated" and that the committees reported "very favourably on the standard of care provided". An in-depth study of the white paper showed that Robinson's interpretation was incorrect, verging on deceitful. This fitted with the observation of Max Beloff, Professor of Government and Public Administration at Oxford, that "most inquiries are so manned that they turn out to be nothing but the system looking at itself, and finding more to admire than to blame."
Related scandals Staff in several other psychiatric hospitals made similar allegations. A
World in Action television documentary about
Powick Hospital,
Ward F13, exposed undignified batch-living of 78 elderly women on one
Nightingale ward with overworked nurses. There was "smouldering discontent" among the nursing students at
Whittingham Hospital, Lancashire, but the senior nurses ignored their concerns. An employee at
South Ockendon Hospital, Essex, anonymously sent Robb pages torn from a ward report book, describing severe injuries probably inflicted by staff on a patient. Other disturbing reports emerged, including deaths of patients at
Farleigh Hospital, Bristol, and the convictions of three ward staff for manslaughter. A report about
Sans Everything by David Roxan in the
News of the World triggered letters of concern about other hospitals. Roxan forwarded them to the Ministry. One concerned
Ely Hospital, Cardiff: the Welsh Hospital Board set up a committee of inquiry, chaired by
Geoffrey Howe, who had recently represented the
National Coal Board managers at the inquiry into the
Aberfan disaster. The committee upheld most of the allegations from the whistleblower, nursing auxiliary Michael Pantelides, which were similar to those in
Sans Everything. Howe wanted his full report published. Crossman (Robinson had since left the Ministry of Health), fearful of Howe's legal skills and Robb's relationship with the press, agreed. The day Crossman revealed the Ely Inquiry findings in the Commons, he also announced plans to establish an NHS hospitals' inspectorate to help ensure higher standards. The Ely Inquiry, along with those at Farleigh, Whittingham and South Ockendon, vindicated Robb and
Sans Everything, although the NHS authorities made no public apology.
Sans Everything faded from the agenda, while the other inquiries, especially Ely, achieved highly regarded status. == Outcomes, death and legacy ==