At Mission Point on the California coast,
L. scabra coexists with the similar species,
Lottia digitalis, but each occupies a slightly different habitat.
L. digitalis tends to occupy vertical rock faces or overhangs and certain horizontal ones clothed by
algae and
barnacles.
L. digitalis clump together more often, prefer wave-exposed areas, occupy sites further up the shore and are seldom found in rock pools. Both species move about freely when the tide is up but
L. digitalis settles in a different location at each low tide whereas
L. scabra tends to home to the same spot.
L. scabra has a more rugged outline and grows to fit the rock surface of its home base. The differences in micro-habitat may be explained by its greater tolerance of exposure to desiccation during low tides in less protected sites because it is able to retain water better. If transplanted to unfamiliar territory, each species soon reselects its typical base habitat. In an experiment, when these two species were caged together with only vertical surfaces available, it was found that
L. scabra grew at a much slower rate and achieved a much smaller maximum size than similar limpets in control plots. It seems that the ability of
L. digitalis to respond to seasonal changes by moving up and down the shore and utilising resources better give it an edge over the more static species which remains for life in its restricted home range.
L. scabra is less able to compete under optimal conditions and is therefore restricted to horizontal, more-
desiccating habitats. File:Macklintockia scabra 003.jpg|Apical and basal view File:Macklintockia scabra 002.jpg|Basal view File:Macklintockia scabra 001.jpg|
Lottia scabra ==References==