In November 1999, the trial began in the wrongful death lawsuit. William Pepper represented the King family. The three-and-one-half-week trial, referred to in U.S. government records as simply
King v. Jowers, was conducted in Memphis in Shelby County Circuit Court with presiding Judge James E. Swearengen. Thousands of documents were presented; over 70 witnesses took the stand or were cited by deposition, audiotape, videotape, or by other witnesses. Some observers commented on what they perceived as a surprising lack of American media interest in the trial. Bárbara Reis was a correspondent for the
Lisbon daily
Público who attended several days of the proceedings. She was quoted as saying, "Everything in the U.S. is the trial of the century.
O.J. Simpson's trial was the trial of the century.
Clinton's trial was the trial of the century. But this
is the trial of the century, and who's here?" They found Jowers responsible, and also found that "government agencies" were among the co-conspirators. The King family was granted the $100 they requested in damages, and they saw the verdict as vindication. King's son
Dexter said, "This is the period at the end of the sentence. So please, after today, we don't want questions like, 'Do you believe James Earl Ray killed your father?' I've been hearing that all my life. No, I don't, and this is the end of it."
James Douglass and a local Memphis TV reporter were the only journalists to cover every session of the proceedings. The U.S.
mainstream press did not treat the verdict as a significant development in Dr. King's assassination. In its summary of the trial,
The New York Times reported that "a vast conspiracy [was] alleged but not proved." The weekly magazine
U.S. News & World Report characterized Pepper as "a man prone to bizarre conspiracy theories", and quoted King biographer
Dave Garrow who called the verdict "almost meaningless". ==Result and criticism==