Public Lula, Son of Brazil was a commercial flop, grossing only two million reals (around one million U.S. dollars) in its first week of release, being watched by no more than 200,000 people. In spite of the controversy surrounding the film, it was still the second in box office receipts that week, behind
Avatar. As of January 8, the film had been watched by almost 320,000 people. At the end of its theatrical run, the film had sold 852,212 tickets, making it only the 7th highest-grossing national production of 2010 in Brazil. After watching the film in
London, British Indian actor
Ben Kingsley said that "this film is important for the whole world", adding that "[Lula's] history is bigger than
Gandhi's". Kingsley won the
Academy Award for Best Actor in 1982 for his performance as Mahatma Gandhi in the
eponymous film.
Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 44 out of 100, based on 9 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews". Alexei Barrionuevo, correspondent for
The New York Times in Brazil, criticized the film for "failing to mention that Lula abandoned his girlfriend, Miriam Cordeiro, when she was six months pregnant". Lurian Cordeiro, Lula's daughter with Miriam, sent a letter to the editor saying that her mother was not "abandoned". Cordeiro said that Lula not only paid for all of her mother's medical costs, but also legally recognized her as his daughter on the very day after her birth. She also noted the fact that none of Lula's children are mentioned in the film, questioning that "If the movie is about my father's path from impoverished immigrant to trade union leader, where do my brothers and I fit in?". She finished the letter by saying that she "loved the film" and that she agrees "with President Obama: Lula is the man!". On March 15, 2010, Brazilian magazine
Veja made a list of the top 10 worst Brazilian films of all time, and
Lula, Son of Brazil was featured in ninth place. The list's author, Pollyane Lima e Silva, stated: "The director, Fábio Barreto, went on to say that his intention was not to be faithful to reality, but was, instead, 'to do a melodrama'. And he was successful, since many scenes shown in the film never happened, and others were exaggerated so that Lula could seem like a hero".
Political criticism The film has been criticized by the Brazilian press for being released in an electoral year, while Lula was trying to elect his successor
Dilma Rousseff. The release date would represent a deliberate attempt to influence the outcome of the election, in order to help Lula's candidate. Rousseff admitted in an interview that the film could influence the outcome of the election. But she added that "there is no possible way to measure the effect of this". The DVD release date, scheduled for May 2010, has also been criticized, as the electoral debate would be warming up. The biggest criticism, however, is that the film ignores less flattering aspects of Lula's career. According to
O Globo's Ricardo Noblat, the film represents an attempt to eliminate all of Lula' failures, making him look like the almost perfect protagonist, showing him in an overly romanticized and heroic role. This would also have electoral purposes, according to him. The film was also criticized by opposition politicians, the press and by many Brazilians because many of the companies that invested in the film (such as the heavy construction firms Odebrecht and Camargo Correa, as well as electric utilities) depend on government concessions and have major contracts with the federal government. Glória Pires, who played Lula's mother in the film, said that
Lula, Son of Brazil was a victim of political prejudice. According to her, "people saw another movie (...); the film I was in was based on a beautiful story of overcoming adversities, which was about a man that would become president, and not only a movie about the president itself".
Academy Award submission On September 23, 2010,
Lula, Son of Brazil was unanimously chosen by government Ministry of Culture commission as Brazil's
submission to the 83rd Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. Arnaldo Jabor, whose film
A Suprema Felicidade was also in the competition for the submission, chose not to comment on the Ministry's choice, saying that the commission "must have had reasons" to choose the film. She believes that the film was "analyzed by reputable people, who know the film industry and also how the Oscar dispute works". ==References==