Lysenko's claims In 1928, rejecting
natural selection and
Mendelian genetics,
Trofim Lysenko claimed to have developed agricultural techniques which could radically increase crop yields. These included
vernalization, species transformation (one species turning into another),
inheritance of acquired characteristics, and vegetative hybridization (see below). He claimed in particular that vernalization, exposing
wheat seeds to humidity and low temperature, could greatly increase
crop yield. He claimed further that he could transform one
species,
Triticum durum (durum spring wheat), into
Triticum vulgare (common autumn wheat), through 2 to 4 years of autumn planting. This species transition he claimed to occur without an intermediate form. However, this was already known to be impossible since
T. durum is a
tetraploid with 28 chromosomes (4 sets of 7), while
T. vulgare is
hexaploid with 42 chromosomes (6 sets). . Lysenko's Lamarckian conception could imaginably be achieved by
horizontal gene transfer, though there is no evidence for this. He also claimed that when a tree is
grafted, the
scion permanently changes the heritable characteristics of the
stock. In modern biological theory, such a change is theoretically possible through
horizontal gene transfer; however, there is no evidence that this actually occurs, and Lysenko rejected the mechanism of genes entirely. State media published enthusiastic articles such as "Siberia is transformed into a land of orchards and gardens" and "Soviet people change nature", while anyone opposing Lysenko was presented as a defender of "
mysticism,
obscurantism and backwardness." Lysenko's political success was mostly due to his appeal to the
Communist Party and
Soviet ideology. His attack on the "
bourgeois pseudoscience" of modern genetics and the proposal that plants can rapidly adjust to a changed environment suited the
ideological battle in both agriculture and Soviet society. The Party-controlled newspapers applauded Lysenko's practical "success" and questioned the motives of his critics, ridiculing the timidity of academics who urged the patient, impartial observation required for science. and to decry traditional biologists as "
wreckers" working to sabotage the Soviet economy. He denied the distinction between theoretical and
applied biology, and rejected general methods such as control groups and statistics: Lysenko presented himself as a follower of
Ivan Vladimirovich Michurin, a well-known and well-liked Soviet
horticulturist, but unlike Michurin, Lysenko insisted on using only non-genetic techniques such as
hybridization and grafting. Stalin personally made encouraging edits to a speech by Lysenko, despite the dictator's skepticism toward Lysenko's assertion that all science is class-orientated. The official support emboldened Lysenko and gave him and Prezent free rein to slander any geneticists who still spoke out against him. After Lysenko became head of the
Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences, classical genetics began to be called "fascist science" and many of Lysenkoism's opponents, such as his former mentor
Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov, were imprisoned or executed, although not on Lysenko's personal orders. organized by Lysenko and approved by Stalin. At the end of it, Lysenkoism was declared as "the only correct theory." As Lysenko performatively spoke at the end, "the Central Committee of the Communist Party has examined my report and approved it". Attendants recognized this as the birth of a new orthodoxy. Of the 8 scientists who advocated genetics during the session, 3 immediately announced repentance. and criticism was denounced as "bourgeois" or "fascist". The
Ministry of Higher Education commanded all biological institutes to immediately follow the Lysenko orthodoxy:The Central University Administration and the Administration of Cadres are directed to review within two months all departments of biological faculties to free them from all opposed to Michurinist biology and to strengthen them by appointing Michurinists to them. Point 6 of the
Order No. 1208 (August 23, 1948)For several months, similar central directives dismissed scientists, withdrew textbooks, and required the removal of any references to heredity in higher education. There was also an order to destroy all stocks of
Drosophila, a common
model organism for research in genetics. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin's lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet
nuclear physicists: according to
Tony Judt, "it is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess
their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid."
Effects on scientists Genetics was eventually banned in the Soviet Union. for attempting to oppose Lysenkoism, and genetics research was effectively destroyed until the death of Stalin in 1953. Secret research facilities such as
sharashka were where numerous scientists ended up imprisoned. From 1934 to 1940, under Lysenko's admonitions and with Stalin's approval, many geneticists were executed (including
Izrail Agol,
Solomon Levit, Grigorii Levitskii,
Georgii Karpechenko and
Georgii Nadson) or sent to
labor camps. The famous Soviet geneticist and president of the Agriculture Academy,
Nikolai Vavilov, was arrested in 1940 and died in prison in 1943. In 1936, the American
geneticist Hermann Joseph Muller, who had moved to the
Leningrad Institute of Genetics with his
Drosophila fruit flies, was criticized as bourgeois, capitalist, imperialist, and a promoter of fascism, and he returned to America via Republican Spain.
Iosif Rapoport, who worked on mutagens, refused to publicly repudiate chromosome theory of heredity, and suffered several years as a geological lab assistant.
Dmitry Sabinin's book on plant physiology was abruptly withdrawn from publication in 1948. He died by suicide in 1951. Those who supported Lysenkoism were favored.
Alexander Oparin vigorously defended Lysenkoism and was politically favored, although he may have been genuine in his belief, as he continued to defend it even in 1955, after its fall. Lysenkoism became entrenched not just in academia but in Soviet schools, displacing Darwinism from natural sciences curricula. Inspired by the success of Lysenkoism and the 1948 VASKhNIL session, other fields of Soviet science experienced brief revolutions, albeit with less success: against "Pavlovians" in medicine, against "reactionary Einsteinism" in physics and quantum mechanics, and against
Pauling resonance theory in chemistry. In addition to the biological sciences, Lysenkoism had an impact on geological sciences, especially paleontology and biostratigraphy in the USSR.
Fall At the end of 1952, the situation started to change, and newspapers published articles criticizing Lysenkoism. However, the return to regular genetics slowed down in
Nikita Khrushchev's time, when Lysenko showed him the supposed successes of an experimental agricultural complex. It was once again forbidden to criticize Lysenkoism, though it was now possible to express different views, and the geneticists imprisoned under Stalin were released or
rehabilitated posthumously. The ban was finally lifted in the mid-1960s. Soviet scientists noticed the great advance in
molecular biology, such as the characterization of DNA, and even hold-out Lysenkoists were starting to accept DNA as the material basis for heredity (though they still rejected gene theory). Discoveries in the field of
epigenetics are sometimes raised as alleged late confirmation of Lysenko's theories, but in spite of the apparent high-level similarity (heritable traits passed on without DNA alteration), Lysenko believed that environment-induced changes are the primary mechanism of heritability.
Heritable epigenetic effects have been found, but are minor and unstable compared to genetic inheritance. == Scientific content ==