On the basis of
philological evidence, Indologist and Pali expert
Oskar von Hinüber says that some of the Pali suttas have retained very archaic place-names, syntax, and historical data from close to the Buddha's lifetime, including the
Mahāparinibbāna Sutta. Hinüber proposes a composition date of no later than 350-320 BCE for this text, which would allow for a "true historical memory" of the events approximately 60 years prior if the short chronology for the Buddha's lifetime is accepted (but also reminds us that such a text was originally intended more as
hagiography than as an exact historical record of events). The contents of narratives about the
First Buddhist Council follow closely the narrative presented in the
Mahāparinibbāna Sutta, leading scholars like
Louis Finot and
Erich Frauwallner to conclude that they originally formed a single continuous narrative. These narratives of the First Council and found in part or in whole in all six extant
Vinaya traditions, whose organization and basic contents are believed by many scholars to stem from
before the earliest schisms in the Buddhist Sangha. In some versions, the contents of the Sutta are included before the narrative of the First Council that ends the Skandhaka section of the Vinaya Pitakas. In other cases, the sutta narrative and the council narrative are divided between the Sutta Pitaka and Vinaya Pitaka. ==See also==