Garlasco has a B.A. in government from
St. John's University 1988–1992 and an M.A. in international relations from the
Elliott School of International Affairs at the
George Washington University(1992–1995) He lives in Pleasantville, New York. Garlasco was the senior military analyst in Human Rights Watch's (HRW) Emergencies Division. He specialized in battle damage assessment, military operations, and interrogations. before being hired as an intelligence professional at the
Defense Intelligence Agency working in the Pentagon; he survived the
9/11 attack on the building. He claims he was Chief of
High-value targeting in
The Pentagon during the
Iraq War In total, Garlasco served for seven years in
the Pentagon. He responded to the question "If so much care is being taken why are so many civilians getting killed?" by stating "Because the Taliban are violating international law, and because the U.S. just doesn't have enough troops on the ground. You have the Taliban shielding in people's homes. And you have this small number of troops on the ground. And sometimes the only thing they can do is drop bombs." Garlasco and colleagues focused on the main fighting areas in the
Tigris and
Euphrates river valleys where civilian deaths had been reported, visiting ten cities in total. In October 2004, Garlasco co-authored the report 'Razing Rafah: Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip' after carrying out research with two other HRW staff in the
Gaza Strip,
Israel, and
Egypt. The report documented what it described as a "pattern of illegal demolitions" by the
IDF in
Rafah, a refugee camp and city at the southern end of the Gaza Strip on the border with Egypt where sixteen thousand people lost their homes after the Israeli government approved a plan to expand the de facto
"buffer zone" in May 2004. Garlasco and colleagues examined the background to and effects of the demolitions, the security situation in Rafah, the IDF's main stated rationales for the demolitions, responding to and preventing attacks on its forces and the suppression of weapons smuggling through tunnels from Egypt, and concluded that in most cases the demolitions were "carried out in the absence of military necessity" in violation of international law. He co-authored the 2006
Human Rights Watch report condemning
Israel's use of such weapons in
Lebanon and a report in 2008 documenting how civilians living in
South Ossetia suffered the use of cluster munitions by both the
Russian and
Georgian armies. Colin Kahl, a professor of security studies at Georgetown University, said that Garlasco "knows more about airstrikes than anyone in the world who isn't in the military currently", adding that "when Marc says stuff is messed up, the military has to take it seriously. It's not some wing nut in a human rights group out to get the military". John H. Richardson, a writer at
Esquire, writes that Garlasco's work on torture scandals in Iraq resulted in testimony from American soldiers that led directly to
John McCain's anti-torture
amendment. Richardson also writes that Garlasco was one of the first foreigners to cross the border into Georgia during its war with Russia, and that during the
Gaza War Garlasco lived in an apartment in the middle of the war zone and spent weeks visiting hospitals and bomb sites. Garlasco has attracted some criticism for his reporting, with the
Ottawa Citizen, for example, suggesting in an editorial that he "has made a career of painting Israel as a criminal state". Garlasco appeared as an expert in the documentary film
No End in Sight, which examined in detail some of the key decisions made by the US military and the Pentagon in the early days after the invasion of Iraq. He was also featured in a
60 Minutes story on US military targeting practices that aired October 28, 2007. Criticism that had started to appear, posted by what
The Guardian called pro-Israeli bloggers, had questioned the appropriateness of Garlasco's hobby. Other newspapers such as
The Guardian and
Haaretz covered the controversy in the following days. Israeli Prime Minister
Benyamin Netanyahu's policy director commented that Human Rights Watch's employment of "a man who trades and collects Nazi memorabilia" as its senior military expert is a "new low". He subsequently apologized, writing on
Huffington Post, "I deeply regret causing pain and offense with a handful of juvenile and tasteless postings I made on two websites that study Second World War artifacts". Garlasco added, "I've never hidden my hobby, because there's nothing shameful in it, however weird it might seem to those who aren't fascinated by military history". He also wrote that the allegations of Nazi sympathies were "defamatory nonsense, spread maliciously by people with an interest in trying to undermine Human Rights Watch's reporting," and that "I work to expose war crimes and the Nazis were the worst war criminals of all time". He added, "[p]recisely because it's so obvious that the Nazis were evil, I never realized that other people, including friends and colleagues, might wonder why I care about these things". He went on to say that "I told my daughters, as I wrote in my book, that "the war was horrible and cruel, that Germany lost and for that we should be thankful". HRW Communications Director Emma Daly at first responded to the charge by saying, "Marc Garlasco is not pro-Nazi. These allegations are monstrous. He does not delve into Nazi memorabilia. Garlasco is a student of military history and he has an interest in military history". HRW later issued an official statement that the accusation against Garlasco "is demonstrably false and fits into a campaign to deflect attention from Human Rights Watch's rigorous and detailed reporting on violations of international human rights and humanitarian law by the Israeli government," adding that Garlasco "has never held or expressed Nazi or
anti-Semitic views". HRW associate director Carroll Bogert accused
The Guardian of "repeat[ing] defamatory nonsense unworthy of [the] newspaper," adding that "[t]he allegations of pro-Nazi sympathies are part of a larger campaign to smear non-governmental organisations which criticise the Israel Defense Forces' conduct of the Gaza offensive". Iain Levine, the watchdog's programme director responded by saying that "The Israeli government is trying to eliminate the space for legitimate criticism of the conduct of the IDF, and this is the latest salvo in that campaign". In what has been described by Ed Pilkington of
The Guardian as an "abrupt change of tact" (
sic) for Human Rights Watch, Regarding the suspension, HRW has indicated "This is not a disciplinary measure. Human Rights Watch stands behind Garlasco's research and analysis".
Other responses Critics of Human Rights Watch have suggested that Garlasco's enthusiasm for Nazi-era badges and uniforms goes beyond historical interest and raises questions Nazi sympathy or anti-Semitism.
NGO Monitor, an Israeli NGO that monitors human rights organisations for perceived political bias, described Garlasco's hobby as "problematic" and "insensitive".
Yaron Ezrahi, a professor of Political Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said he did not believe that Mr. Garlasco's interest in memorabilia could support allegations of "premeditated bias," though he indicated it may hurt Human Rights Watch's credibility, and that the revelations had "armed the right-wing fanatics" who try to "demonize" anybody who questions the effects of Israeli military operations. In
Nazi scandal hits human rights group, Katie Engelhart in ''
Maclean's'' magazine reported that "For HRW, the timing of the exposé could not be worse. The group has thrown its weight behind the UN-sponsored Goldstone report, which accuses both Israel and the Palestinians of committing war crimes in the Gaza strip earlier this year. Garlasco's actions will surely lead many to question the group's credibility". According to
The New York Times, HRW Middle East advisory committee member
Helena Cobban questioned on her blog whether Garlasco's military collecting activities were "something an employer like Human Rights Watch ought to be worried about? After consideration, I say Yes". NGO Monitor head
Gerald M. Steinberg, a professor of Political Science at
Bar Ilan University, argued that Human Rights Watch's response to the matter was "too little, too late". Cobban says in suspending Garlasco Human Rights Watch is now "in a better position to take part in the public discussion in this country on what our government should be doing with regard to the Goldstone report". A reporter from
The Sunday Times (London) attempted to contact Garlasco, who wouldn't comment. A friend of Garlasco's indicated he had "in effect" been fired, but had entered into a confidentiality agreement with HRW in which he would be paid for the remainder of his contract if he kept silent. In early March 2010, Garlasco's name was removed from the website.
United Nations Beginning in 2011, Garlasco served as senior civilian protection officer for
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). Heading the UN's Protection of Civilians office, Garlasco monitored civilian casualty rates, and admonished Taliban leader
Mullah Mohammad Omar to refrain from using
mines. In early 2012, as the U.N. senior military advisor for the
Human Rights Council's (HRC)
Independent Commission of Inquiry on
Libya, he investigated civilian casualties while leading a survey of
NATO's
activities in Libya. ==Bibliography==