• Health professionals and trust: The cure for healthcare law and policy. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2011. • Relocation cases: The rhetoric and the reality of a child's best interests: A view from the bottom of the world. Child & Family Law Quarterly, 23(2), pages 226–250 (2011) • What does a child's right to be heard in legal proceedings really mean? ABA custody standards do not go far enough. Family Law Quarterly, 42(1), pages 117–129 (2008) • Relationship property appeals in the New Zealand Court of Appeal 1958–2008: The elusiveness of equality. In R. Bigwood (Ed.), The permanent New Zealand Court of Appeal: Essays on the first 50 years (pages 99–151). Oxford: Henaghan, M., & Peart, N. (2009). Butterworths family law in New Zealand (15th ed.). Wellington, New Zealand:
LexisNexis, (2011) Henaghan, M., Atkin, B., Clarkson, D., & Caldwell, J. • Genes, society and the future (Vol. 2). Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Genome Research Project, University of Otago, Lawson, D., Henaghan, M., & McLean, S. (2007) • Why judges need to know and understand childhood studies. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and childhood studies: Current legal issues 2011 (Vol. 14) (pages 39–54),
Oxford University Press, (2012) • Discretion, status and money: The essence of family law in New Zealand. In B. Atkin (Ed.), The international survey of family law: 2011 edition (pages 281–301). Bristol, UK: Family Law. • New Zealand: How New Zealand family law deals with power imbalances. In B. Atkin (Ed.), International survey of family law: 2010 edition (pages 237–254). Bristol, UK: Family Law. • The human genome. In I. Freckelton & H. Selby (Eds.), Appealing to the future: Michael Kirby and his legacy (pages 473–486). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters (2011) • Achieving economic equality at the end of marriage and other relationships: Not all is fair in love and war. In B. Verschraegen (Ed.), International family law (pages 695–708). Vienna, Austria: Jan Sramek Verlag. (2009) • Bioethics and law in action: Mining the gaps: The Human Genome Research Project. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and bioethics: Current legal issues (Vol. II) (pages 225–237). Oxford University Press (2008). • Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Testing the legal boundaries. In N. Page (Ed.), Genes, society and the future (Vol. 1) (pp. 27–146). Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Genome Research Project, University of Otago. Snelling, J., Peart, N., & Henaghan, M. (2007) • Part one: Main findings:. In N. Page (Ed.), Genes, society and the future (Vol. 1) (pp. 1–24). Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Genome Research Project, University of Otago. Henaghan, M. (2007). • Legally rearranging families: Parents and children after break up. In M. Henaghan and B. Atkin (Ed.), Family law policy in New Zealand (3rd ed.) (pp. 269–360). Wellington, New Zealand: LexisNexis. Henaghan, M. (2007). • Legally defining the family. In M. Henaghan and B. Atkin (Ed.), Family law policy in New Zealand (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–46). Wellington, New Zealand: LexisNexis. Henaghan, M. (2007). • The 'Do no harm' principle and the genetic revolution in New Zealand. In McLean, S. A. M. (Ed.), First do no harm: Law, ethics and healthcare (pp. 511–526). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. Henaghan, M. (2006). • Family law policy in New Zealand (3rd ed.). Wellington, New Zealand: LexisNexis, 367p. Henaghan, M., & Atkin, B. (Eds.). (2007). • Choosing genes for future children: Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Genome Research Project, University of Otago, 369p. Henaghan, M. (Ed.). (2006). • The changes to final appeals in New Zealand since the creation of the New Zealand Supreme Court. Otago Law Review, 12(3), 579–604. Henaghan, M. (2011). • Delays in the New Zealand civil justice system? Opinion v fact. Otago Law Review, 12(3), 455–471. Righarts, S., & Henaghan, M. (2011). • Children: Heard but not listened to? An analysis of children's views under s 6 of the Care of Children's Act 2004. New Zealand Family Law Journal, 7(2), 39–52. Robinson, A., & Henaghan, M. (2011). • Relocation cases: The rhetoric and the reality of a child's best interests: A view from the bottom of the world. Child & Family Law Quarterly, 23(2), 226–250. Henaghan, M. (2011). • Relocation following parental separation in New Zealand: Complexity and diversity. International Family Law, (March), 97–105. Taylor, N., Gollop, M., & Henaghan, M. (2010). • Public perceptions of the New Zealand court system: An empirical approach to law reform. Otago Law Review, 12(2), 329–344. Righarts, S., & Henaghan, M. (2010). • Legal responses to violence in the home in New Zealand.
University of New South Wales Law Journal, 33(3), 870–894. Henaghan, M., & Ballantyne, R. (2010). • What does a child's right to be heard in legal proceedings really mean? ABA custody standards do not go far enough. Family Law Quarterly, 42(1), 117–129. Henaghan, M. (2008). • Digital era subverts suppression, interviewed by Timothy Brown in
Otago Daily Times about
Queenstown suppressed indecency case (July 2014) • Identifier: . ==References==