Societal response After the wedding, Ert was fired from his job as a wig salesman, but continued to perform full-time as Mr. Vikki Carr in local nightclubs. The couple laid low until the media sensation passed, stating that they were "afraid of police harassment". While many LGBT rights activists celebrated the union, others found it distasteful. Several activists were not happy that Ert was a drag queen, and did not want their community to be represented as such, according to
University at Buffalo Law Professor Michael Boucai.
Clerk opposition and lawsuit When Molina and his attorney, Richard Cross, arrived at the Wharton County clerk office to record the marriage one day after the ceremony, the Wharton County clerk office refused because both Ert and Molina were male. Wharton County Clerk Delfin Marek stated that the office did not have the authority to give marriage licenses to two people of the same sex. Molina returned to the office on October 26 to try again, but was again rejected. Molina then asked a civil court judge to require the clerk to recognize his marriage and filed a lawsuit against the clerk office. Cross defended the couple by quoting Attorney General Martin's September 14 ruling, and stated since Ert and Molina had obtained a valid marriage license, they should be allowed to wed. Additionally, Cross said the only things that would void the marriage would be if they were related or already married to someone else, neither of which were true of the couple. Cross stated his intention to take the case as high as it would go, including to the
U.S. Supreme Court, before getting a ruling in Molina's favor. He also quoted Section 2.02 of the Texas Family Code, which states: Martin's ruling did not state what would happen if a same-sex couple was wed after obtaining a license, through deception or otherwise; thus, the situation was unprecedented and Cross dubbed it a
test case. Additionally, there was no law in Texas at that time preventing same-sex marriage, although homosexuality itself was illegal. The
Houston Police Department threatened to arrest Ert and Molina for obtaining a license under false pretenses, although they did not follow through. Reverend Vincent stated, "We marry souls, not bodies. They met the requirements as set forth by the church; they love each other, and they had a license.... As far as I'm concerned, they are married in the eyes of God and in the eyes of Texas."
Court response Shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the related 1971 same-sex marriage case from Minnesota, the Texas district court declined Cross's appeal to record the marriage on November 20. Cross then appealed to the
Texas Court of Civil Appeals. On December 8, Attorney General Crawford Martin, speaking through
District Attorney for the 23rd Judicial District Jack Salyer, declared the union
null and void, upheld the clerk's decision to not recognize the marriage, and said it was impossible for a same-sex couple to be married. Martin added that although county clerks could not cancel marriage licenses, the marriage was still invalid; Martin said when Texas state law was enacted, legislators had intended for marriage to only be between opposite-sex couples, and that this opinion could be presumed from the appearance of questions regarding a female's maiden name on the marriage license form. Furthermore, Martin stated that since Ert had filled out parts of the document intended for a female—although he never disclosed his sex—he had engaged in
false swearing and could therefore face prison time of two to five years. Cross retaliated by again stating that there was nothing in Texas law that explicitly specified a married couple must be of the opposite sex, and that "if the attorney general would read his own opinion, he would find that it didn't require one of the applicants to be a woman." In response to Martin, Cross attempted to take the case to the
Texas Supreme Court and prepared to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, Cross's appeal was denied because it was filed too late, effectively ending the legal battle. The failed lawsuit was seen as a huge setback to LGBT rights in the U.S. It also caused a firestorm among Texas legislators, at a time when there was already turmoil in the legislature as a result of the
Sharpstown scandal. These state legislators worked to change the language of the law to specify marriage as between "a man and a woman" instead of simply between "two persons" under 63R House Bill 103, which passed almost unanimously. In June 1973,
Texas Governor Dolph Briscoe signed the legislation into law, which went into effect on January 1, 1974. Thus, Martin's ruling was upheld and sealed the loophole in Texas state law and officially restricted Texas marriage to opposite-sex couples. House Bill 103 was the first anti-gay marriage law in Texas, which would be followed in
1999,
2003,
2005, and
2015. ==Later life==