Since Mars Direct was initially conceived, it has undergone regular review and development by Zubrin himself, the
Mars Society,
NASA,
Stanford University and others.
Mars Semi-Direct Zubrin and Weaver developed a modified version of Mars Direct, called Mars Semi-Direct, in response to some specific criticisms. This mission consists of three spacecraft and includes a "Mars Ascent Vehicle" (MAV). The ERV remains in Mars orbit for the return journey, while the uncrewed MAV lands and manufactures propellants for the ascent back up to Mars orbit. The Mars Semi-Direct architecture has been used as the basis of a number of studies, including the NASA Design Reference Missions. When subjected to the same cost-analysis as the
90-day report, Mars Semi-Direct was predicted to cost 55 billion dollars over 10 years, capable of fitting into the existing NASA budget. Mars Semi-Direct became the basis of the
Design Reference Mission 1.0 of NASA, replacing the
Space Exploration Initiative.
Design Reference Mission The NASA model, referred to as the
Design Reference Mission, on version 5.0 as of September 1, 2012, calls for a significant upgrade in hardware (at least three launches per mission, rather than two), and sends the ERV to Mars fully fueled, parking it in orbit above the planet for subsequent rendezvous with the MAV.
Mars Direct and SpaceX With the potentially imminent advent of low-cost
heavy lift capability, Zubrin has posited a dramatically lower cost human Mars mission using hardware developed by
space transport company
SpaceX. In this simpler plan, a crew of two would be sent to Mars by a single
Falcon Heavy launch, the
Dragon spacecraft acting as their interplanetary cruise habitat. Additional living space for the journey would be enabled through the use of inflatable add-on modules if required. The problems associated with long-term weightlessness would be addressed in the same manner as the baseline Mars Direct plan, a tether between the Dragon habitat and the TMI (Trans-Mars Injection) stage acting to allow rotation of the craft. The Dragon's heatshield characteristics could allow for a safe descent if landing rockets of sufficient power were made available. Research at NASA's
Ames Research Center has demonstrated that a robotic Dragon would be capable of a fully propulsive landing on the Martian surface. On the surface, the crew would have at their disposal two Dragon spacecraft with inflatable modules as habitats, two ERVs, two Mars ascent vehicles and 8 tonnes of cargo.
Other Studies The Mars Society and Stanford studies retain the original two-vehicle mission profile of Mars Direct, but increase the crew size to six. A study by Donald Barker and AIAA called
Solar System Longboats also uses a two-vehicle system and a crew of six, but splits it between a two identical vehicle pairs (each with a crew of three, but capable of carrying all six in an emergency), as well as adding an
inflatable living space and a water-based radiation shelter to the ERV.
Mars Society Australia developed their own four-person
Mars Oz reference mission, based on Mars Semi-Direct. This study uses horizontally landing, bent biconic shaped modules, and relies on solar power and chemical propulsion throughout, where Mars Direct and the DRMs used nuclear reactors for surface power and, in the case of the DRMs for propulsion as well. The Mars Oz reference mission also differs in assuming, based on space station experience, that spin gravity will not be required. ==Mars Analogue Research Stations==