Box office The film
underperformed to expectations at the box office, grossing $16.4 million against a $9 million budget. The disappointment
depressed Scorsese and worsened his drug addiction. Certain that
New York, New York would be a hit, United Artists structured the film's box office as a bulwark against the flop that they had expected in
Rocky. The two productions pooled their profits, but
Rocky ended up covering the losses of Scorsese's movie. In his introduction to the film's
DVD release, Scorsese explains that he intended for the film, which he saw as an
homage to the
musicals of
Classical Hollywood cinema, to break from the gritty realism for which he had become famous, hence the deliberately artificial sets and storyline. He acknowledges that the experiment did not please everyone.
Critical response The film has an overall critical score of 58% on
Rotten Tomatoes, based on 50 reviews; the site's consensus explains, "Martin Scorsese's technical virtuosity and Liza Minnelli's magnetic presence are on full display in
New York, New York, although this ambitious musical's blend of swooning style and hard-bitten realism makes for a queasy mixture."
Christopher Porterfield wrote in
Time, "If this movie were a big-band arrangement, it would be a duet for a sax man and a girl singer, but with the soloists in a different key from the band."
Vincent Canby of
The New York Times wondered, "Why should a man of Mr. Scorsese's talent be giving us what amounts to no more than a film buff's essay on a pop-film form that was never, at any point in film history, of the first freshness?"
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times lamented, "Scorsese's New York, New York never pulls itself together into a coherent whole, but if we forgive the movie its confusions we're left with a good time." In the
Chicago Reader,
Dave Kehr concluded, "Scorsese created a very handsome and dynamic film, but the spectacular set pieces don't add up to much."
Variety raved, "A final burst from Old Hollywood, Minnelli tears into the title song and it's a wowser." ''
Time Out's''
Geoff Andrew enthused, "Scorsese's tribute/parody/critique of the MGM musical is a razor-sharp dissection of the conventions of both meeting-cute romances and rags-to-riches biopics. Independent reviewer
Gene Shalit said that the argument between Francine and Jimmy in the parked car was the most realistic he had ever seen on film. In
Cinéaste, Leonard and Barbara Quart called the film "an interesting and at sometimes exciting failure..." They pointed out the self-conscious parallels with the work of Liza's mother in
A Star Is Born, and praised Scorsese's "stylized settings (gold tinsel snowfalls, claustrophobic reddish interiors, and spotlit, dream-like musical solos)", but felt that they were "too calculated and without purpose". William Harding heaped blame on De Niro's performance: "[He] zooms in on the role as if he were playing
Hamlet. His hard work backfires...The character of Jimmy Doyle is completely obscured by the spectacle of DeNiro attempting to come to grips with an impossibly one-note role."
Accolades The film is recognized by
American Film Institute in these lists: • 2004:
AFI's 100 Years...100 Songs: • "
Theme from New York, New York – #31 • 2006:
AFI's Greatest Movie Musicals – Nominated ==Stage musicals==