There had been plans for the construction of a second road bridge across the Rhine near Maxau for several years. The increasing traffic is one reason, but there is also the expected need to rehabilitate the cable-stayed bridge built in 1966, which requires the closure of the bridge in the longer-term. Therefore, the refurbishment is expected to require the prior construction of a second Rhine bridge. In the spatial planning procedure, which was completed in June 2006,
option I, which is a few kilometres north of the existing bridge site, was considered as well as
option II in the immediate vicinity of the existing bridge. The decision of the
Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Süd ("Structure and authorisation directorate south", a regional body of Rhineland Palatinate) in
Neustadt an der Weinstraße favoured a modified
option I: the link to
B 9 in the west would partly run over the route of today's district route 25 (
Wörther Hafenstraße). A small forest area would be crossed on low pillars, in order to maintain existing animal migrations paths and
biotopes. The approach on the
Palatine side is problematic in both options because of the dense settlement next to the Rhine: The approach to option II would be a viaduct through the residential area of Maximiliansau. There were two proposals from the
Landesbetrieb Mobilität Rheinland-Pfalz (Rhineland-Palatinate state authority for mobility) for the connection from option I to the west and one produced by a
citizens initiative. There was also controversy in relation to the planned Karlsruhe north tangent road as well as the connection to the existing south tangent road. On 26 April 2011, the plans were submitted for the planning approval process. The Karlsruhe town council decided by majority to issue a negative opinion on the planning on 24 May 2011. An alliance of around 30 nature conservation associations and citizens' associations from Karlsruhe and the South Palatinate rejected the planning and identified more than 100 serious shortcomings and demanded improvements. An action plan called
Per Ersatzbrücke Maxau ("by replacement bridge Maxau"), on the other hand, called for replacing the old bridge with a new bridge. In order to clarify open questions and to resolve information deficits, the two new state governments agreed to carry out a fact check on 18 and 22 November 2011 in Karlsruhe and to the subsequent establishment of a working group called
Leistungsfähige Rheinquerung ("Efficient Rhine crossing"), which ended in November 2012. Results of both exercises were published on the Internet. The discussions were held in the Rhineland-Palatinate planning approval process on 3 and 4 July 2013 in Wörth and for the Baden-Württemberg planning approval process in Karlsruhe on 9, 10 and 11 July 2013. The city of Karlsruhe and the nature conservation associations criticised the numerous deficiencies in nature conservation, problems of capacity and traffic safety on the Baden side, problems for bicycle traffic, inadequate variation of weightings in the assessment system and the division into two procedures with inadequate overall consideration of the traffic and nature conservation issues. This advocacy led to the separation of, on the one hand, the study of traffic issues on the Palatinate side and increased capacity and improved road safety from, on the other hand, security against the failure of the Rhine crossing in the case of road or shipping accidents. One day before the discussion, Federal Minister of Transport
Peter Ramsauer visited the bridge and described it as "the worst bottleneck in Germany". The states of Baden-Württemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate have approved the construction of a second Rhine bridge designated as
B 293. Baden-Württemberg has also designated a replacement bridge on the route of the B 10 for the
Bundesverkehrswegeplan (federal transport plan). An investigation carried out by the
Landesbetrieb Mobilität Speyer at the request of the government of Baden-Württemberg showed that a new bridge between the old road bridge and the railway bridge was not possible. Moreover, this option was subject to natural environmental conditions on the Baden-Württemberg side. The Federal Court of Audit has found the project to be neither necessary nor economic, because the traffic problem it seeks to resolve is the result of a bottleneck in Karlsruhe not at the Rhine bridge. ==See also==