Maximum length sequence

MLS are generated using maximal linear-feedback shift registers. An MLS-generating system with a shift register of length 4 is shown in Fig. 1. It can be expressed using the following recursive relation: :\begin{cases} a_3[n+1] = a_0[n] + a_1[n]\\ a_2[n+1] = a_3[n] \\ a_1[n+1] = a_2[n] \\ a_0[n+1] = a_1[n] \\ \end{cases} where n is the time index and + represents modulo-2 addition. For bit values 0 = FALSE or 1 = TRUE, this is equivalent to the XOR operation. As MLS are periodic and shift registers cycle through every possible binary value (with the exception of the zero vector), registers can be initialized to any state, with the exception of the zero vector. Polynomial interpretation A polynomial over GF(2) can be associated with the linear-feedback shift register. It has degree of the length of the shift register, and has coefficients that are either 0 or 1, corresponding to the taps of the register that feed the xor gate. For example, the polynomial corresponding to Figure 1 is x^4+x+1. A necessary and sufficient condition for the sequence generated by a LFSR to be maximal length is that its corresponding polynomial be primitive. Implementation MLS are inexpensive to implement in hardware or software, and relatively low-order feedback shift registers can generate long sequences; a sequence generated using a shift register of length 20 is 220 − 1 samples long (1,048,575 samples). ==Properties of maximum length sequences==

MLS have the following properties, as formulated by Solomon Golomb. Balance property The occurrence of 0 and 1 in the sequence should be approximately the same. More precisely, in a maximum length sequence of length 2^n-1 there are 2^{n-1} ones and 2^{n-1}-1 zeros. The number of ones equals the number of zeros plus one, since the state containing only zeros cannot occur. Run property A "run" is a sub-sequence of consecutive "1"s or consecutive "0"s within the MLS concerned. The number of runs is the number of such sub-sequences. Of all the "runs" (consisting of "1"s or "0"s) in the sequence : • One half of the runs are of length 1. • One quarter of the runs are of length 2. • One eighth of the runs are of length 3. • ... etc. ... Correlation property The circular autocorrelation of an MLS is a Kronecker delta function (with DC offset and time delay, depending on implementation). For the ±1 convention, i.e., bit value 1 is assigned s = +1 and bit value 0 s = -1, mapping XOR to the negative of the product: R(n)=\frac 1 N \sum_{m=1}^N s[m]\, s^*[m+n]_N = \begin{cases} 1 &\text{if } n = 0, \\ -\frac 1 N &\text{if } 0 where s^* represents the complex conjugate and [m+n]_N represents a circular shift. The linear autocorrelation of an MLS approximates a Kronecker delta. ==Extraction of impulse responses==

If a linear time invariant (LTI) system's impulse response is to be measured using a MLS, the response can be extracted from the measured system output y[n] by taking its circular cross-correlation with the MLS. This is because the autocorrelation of a MLS is 1 for zero-lag, and nearly zero (−1/N where N is the sequence length) for all other lags; in other words, the autocorrelation of the MLS can be said to approach unit impulse function as MLS length increases. If the impulse response of a system is h[n] and the MLS is s[n], then :y[n] = (h*s)[n].\, Taking the cross-correlation with respect to s[n] of both sides, :{\phi}_{sy} = h[n]*{\phi}_{ss}\, and assuming that φss is an impulse (valid for long sequences) :h[n] = {\phi}_{sy}.\, Any signal with an impulsive autocorrelation can be used for this purpose, but signals with high crest factor, such as the impulse itself, produce impulse responses with poor signal-to-noise ratio. It is commonly assumed that the MLS would then be the ideal signal, as it consists of only full-scale values and its digital crest factor is the minimum, 0 dB. However, after analog reconstruction, the sharp discontinuities in the signal produce strong intersample peaks, degrading the crest factor by 4-8 dB or more, increasing with signal length, making it worse than a sine sweep. Other signals have been designed with minimal crest factor, though it is unknown if it can be improved beyond 3 dB. ==Relationship to Hadamard transform==

Cohn and Lempel showed the relationship of the MLS to the Hadamard transform. This relationship allows the correlation of an MLS to be computed in a fast algorithm similar to the FFT. ==See also==