MarketSea Lion Field
Company Profile

Sea Lion Field

Sea Lion Field is a prospective oil field in the South Atlantic Ocean, some 220 kilometres (140 mi) north of the Falkland Islands. The field is estimated to have a reserve of nearly 800 million barrels of oil, which makes it larger than any North Sea oil projects. The development of the field has divided opinion, with the British Government stating that it should not go ahead as they have cancelled all new oil and gas licences, however, the Falkland Islands Government state that this is a matter for them as a devolved entity, and not part of United Kingdom law. The project is expected to generate £4 billion in income for the Falkland Islands.

History
The field was discovered in 2010 in water depth up to , and an initial estimated reserve of 500 million barrels of oil. The Falklands Basin has been drilled by Shell and Amerada Hess, but they did not discover any oil reserves. The initial drilling phase is expected to produce up to 55,000 barrels of oil per day (bopd), expected to ramp up to 80,000 bopd when the project is in full operation. Estimates for the project predict that the field could yield 400 million barrels of oil over its lifetime, with one oil commentator stating that "I can't remember the last time that amount was discovered in the UK North Sea." The project is expected to last for 35 years and generate around £4 billion in revenue for the Falkland Islands, (which has a population of just under 3,700), which equates to about £1 million per islander. Whilst the project is expected to be controversial from objections by neighbouring South American countries, the low tax threshold compared with the Great Britain's North Sea oil and gas tax, is favourable. To stimulate investment, Rockhopper sold a 60% stake in the project to Premier Oil in return for a $1 billion investment. By 2025 the lead company involved was Navitas Petroleum who have a 65% stake, with Rockhopper Exploration holding the remaining 35%. A consultation of the project in summer 2024, seems to have acquired support from the islanders themselves. == Opinions ==
Opinions
Charles Moore, writing in the Daily Telegraph, argues that Britain should support its overseas territory in this matter as it does not have any strategic reserves of oil. In the future, Great Britain will be required to only source their oil from "bad places", but the Falkland Islands are a key ally, and a friendly source which Great Britain could rely on. Falklands Conservation were critical of the project stating that "We believe that there is significant corner-cutting in both the gathering of evidence and in the proposed commitments to address environmental impacts. In particular, it fails to provide a firm commitment to offsetting all carbon emissions – the millions of tonnes produced during the development and the more than 100 million tonnes from burning of Falklands oil. Regrettably, the EIS and proposed development is inconsistent with best practice standards, global climate targets and non-polluting developments." A spokesperson for the UK Government stated that “As the Foreign Secretary set out in his speech on the climate crisis last week [September 2024], we are resetting the UK’s approach to climate and nature by rapidly delivering new, more efficient ways to reduce emissions. Since 2001, the UK has ceased financial support for the fossil fuel energy sector, including in its overseas territories. The natural resources of all UK Overseas Territories belong to the individual territories. Exploration of natural resources on the Falkland Islands is a matter for the Falkland Islands.” == References ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com