Mechanistic interpretability

The term mechanistic interpretability was coined by Chris Olah as a description of his work in circuit analysis as opposed to usual methods in interpretable AI. Circuit analysis attempted to completely characterize individual features and circuits within models, while the broader field tended towards gradient-based approaches like saliency maps. Before circuit analysis, work in the subfield combined various techniques such as feature visualization, dimensionality reduction, and attribution with human-computer interaction methods to analyze models like the vision model Inception v1. == Key concepts ==

Mechanistic interpretability aims to identify structures, circuits or algorithms encoded in the weights of machine learning models. This contrasts with earlier interpretability methods that focused primarily on input-output explanations. Linear representation hypothesis exhibit a linear representation of semantics. The relationship between a country and its capital is encoded in a linear direction in the example above.This hypothesis suggests that high-level concepts are represented as linear directions in the activation space of neural networks. Empirical evidence from word embeddings and large language models supports this view, although it does not hold up universally. == Methods ==

Mechanistic interpretability employs causal methods to understand how internal model components influence outputs, often using formal tools from causality theory. Mechanistic interpretability, in the field of AI safety, is used to understand and verify the behavior of complex AI systems, and to attempt to identify potential risks Features and circuits A circuit in a neural network is composed of causal chains of feature activations. By mapping out what circuits lead to what downstream consequences, as well as by activating and inhibiting circuits, one can analyze how a neural network (such as an LLM) reaches a given result from a given input. == References ==