View that non-LTCR recovery is problematic The view that there were problematic aspects of the interaction of non-LTCR Medicaid estate recovery with the ACA has been put forth in various places since the ACA was passed, and stemmed from the fact that much of the coverage made available under the ACA is Medicaid, which is subject to estate recovery for people 55 and older, in a number of states. The ACA was designed to make available and promoted as allowing affordable health insurance to all people without other forms of insurance. It attempts to make the insurance available (for the case of US citizens) by retaining existing
Medicaid programs ("traditional Medicaid," which generally required both low incomes and very low asset levels); by starting a new class of
Medicaid for people with Modified Adjusted Gross Incomes (MAGIs) no more than 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) and having no maximum asset levels; by offering people with all income levels access to on-exchange insurance plans from private insurers; and by offering sliding-scale income-based subsidies for those with MAGIs above 100% of the FPL to 400% of the FPL, provided they are not eligible for either a traditional Medicaid or expanded Medicaid, a Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), or an employer's or a family member's employer's insurance program. An additional problematic aspect of the estate recovery of non-LTCR expenses that was brought up was the unequal treatment of people below 138% of the FPL under the ACA, who get expanded Medicaid and are subject to estate recovery if they are 55 or older, and people just above 138% of the FPL, who get highly subsidized, very-low-net-cost, on-exchange insurance, which is not subject to estate recovery. Another aspect raised was that people, under the ACA, had to be covered under threat of a financial penalty unless they were covered, but for many people, the only affordable coverage available was Medicaid. That came often with capitation charges against the person's estate, even if medical services were unused, which include New Jersey, and the District of Columbia As of August 2019, at least 12 states that have expanded Medicaid: Massachusetts, "MAGI methodology" for Medicaid eligibility refers to roughly those people added to Medicaid in expanded Medicaid. going into effect on January 1, 2014, a number of Medicaid expansion states had had laws and regulations that underwent non-LTCR estate recovery and have stopped or limited the practice but not necessarily permanently: • New York (starting April 1, 2014) • Connecticut (retroactive to ACA main provisions start; expanded Medicaid only; not extending to all non-long-term-care related) • Washington (at ACA main provisions start) • Oregon (at ACA main provisions start) • California (2017) • Minnesota (2017) Minnesota has language on the signature page of its ACA application that may leave open its option to estate recover from current Medicaid recipients if it changes its laws or regulations in the future, and/or to recover from Medicaid recipients in future years on ACA auto-renewals. • Colorado In addition, there are some Medicaid expansion states without non-LTCR Medicaid estate recovery and still without it (such as Pennsylvania).
States maintaining non-LTCR estate recovery In other Medicaid expansion states with non-LTCR Medicaid estate recovery just prior to the ACA main provisions, such as Massachusetts, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Indiana, Idaho, Utah, and Maryland, as well as in the District of Columbia, the recovery of non-LTCR persists. == External links ==