The name
Menes is first documented in the work of
Manetho, an Egyptian historian and priest of the relatively late
Ptolemaic period. Manetho noted the name in Greek as Μήνης (
transliterated:
Mênês). An alternative Greek form, Μιν (transliterated:
Min), was cited by the fifth-century-BC historian
Herodotus, but this variant appears to be unrelated, the result of contamination from the name of the god
Min. The Egyptian form,
mnj, is taken from the
Turin and
Abydos King Lists, which are dated to the
Nineteenth Dynasty, whose pronunciation has been reconstructed as . By the early
New Kingdom, changes in the Egyptian language meant his name was already pronounced . The name
mnj means "He who endures", which,
I.E.S. Edwards (1971) suggests, may have been coined as "a mere descriptive
epithet denoting a semi-legendary hero [...] whose name had been lost". Alternatively, the name may conceal the collective identity of the
Naqada III rulers:
Ka,
Scorpion II and
Narmer, or may simply refer to a functional leadership role.
Narmer, Hor-Aha, and Menes (left and center) and a name of Menes (right) in hieroglyphs. The almost complete absence of any mention of Menes in the archaeological record and the comparative wealth of evidence of
Narmer, a protodynastic figure credited by posterity and in the archaeological record with a firm claim to the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, has given rise to a theory identifying Menes with Narmer. The lead archaeological reference to Menes is an
ivory label (from the town
Naqada) which depicts the
royal title Aha (the pharaoh
Hor-Aha) next to a building, and within this is the
royal title mn, generally taken to be Menes. From this, various theories on the nature of the building (a funerary booth or a shrine), the meaning of the word
mn (a name or the verb
endures) and the relationship between Hor-Aha and Menes (as one person or as successive pharaohs) have arisen. The Turin and Abydos king lists, generally accepted to be correct, list the
nesu-bit-names of the pharaohs, not their
Horus name, and are vital to the potential reconciliation of the various records: the
nesu-bit-names of the king lists, the Horus-names of the archaeological record and the number of pharaohs in Dynasty I according to Manetho and other historical sources.
Flinders Petrie first attempted this task, associating
Iti with
Djer as the third pharaoh of Dynasty I,
Teti (Turin) (or another
Iti (Abydos)) with Hor-Aha as second pharaoh, and Menes (a
nebty-name) with Narmer (a Horus-name) as first pharaoh of Dynasty I. Lloyd (1994) finds this succession "extremely probable", and Cervelló-Autuori (2003) categorically states that "Menes is Narmer and the First Dynasty begins with him". However, Seidlmayer (2004) states that it is "a fairly safe inference" that Menes was Hor-Aha. Two documents have been put forward as proof either Narmer or
Hor-Aha was Menes. The first is the "Naqada Label" found at the site of Naqada, in the tomb of Queen Neithhotep, often assumed to have been the mother of Horus Aha. The label shows a
serekh of Hor-Aha next to an enclosure inside of which are symbols that have been interpreted by some scholars as the name "Menes". The second is the seal impression from Abydos that alternates between a
serekh of Narmer and the chessboard symbol, "
mn", which is interpreted as an abbreviation of Menes. Inconclusive arguments have been made with regard to each of these documents in favour of Narmer or Hor-Aha being Menes. , paying homage. First Dynasty, 2960–2770, Tomb of Narmer B17,
Abydos. The second document, the seal impression from Abydos, shows the serekh of Narmer alternating with the gameboard sign (
mn), together with its phonetic complement, the
n sign, which is always shown when the full name of Menes is written, again representing the name "Menes". At first glance, this would seem to be strong evidence that Narmer was Menes. However, based on an analysis of other early
First Dynasty seal impressions, which contain the name of one or more princes, the seal impression has been interpreted by other scholars as showing the name of a prince of Narmer named Menes, hence Menes was Narmer's successor, Hor-Aha, and thus Hor-Aha was Menes. This was refuted by ; but opinions still vary, and the seal impression cannot be said to definitively support either theory.
Herodotus, having mentioned
Min as the first king of Egypt, wrote that
Linus, or Egyptian
Maneros, was "the only son of the first king of Egypt" and that he died untimely. == Dates ==