Rohan Naahar of
The Indian Express called the series "Ludicrous", saying that it "deliberately peddles conspiracy theories". Nick Schager of
The Daily Beast said the series details 3 "dubious" explanations for the plane's disappearance, and "wallows in murky and absurd waters" but provides "illuminating context for why some chose to believe the unbelievable". Meera Suresh of
The Week said the series was "A lame attempt that pushes conspiracy theories", reporting that "the biggest of all the mysteries would be why Netflix offered these theorists a platform to peddle their illogical, unscientific and outlandish ideas. This three-part docuseries is nothing but a podium for baseless theories offering cheap thrill at the cost of the poor souls who went missing and their relatives." The review also pointed out problems with the conspiracy theories highlighted in each episode, as follows: • Episode 1: "...the docuseries shows no such mercy as Zaharie [the pilot] is brutally dissected here for purposefully crashing the plane, all with no proof." • Episode 2: "...nothing can salvage the illogical conspiracy theory offered by
Jeff Wise as his "idea that the flight was hijacked by Russians...from the electronics bay...is preposterous." • Episode 3: "So offensive and galling" is [French journalist Florence de Changy's] theory that U.S. jets shot down the flight, that "it feels somehow disrespectful to have led an ear to it." Richard Roeper of the
Chicago Sun-Times called the series compelling, concluding its review with "So many of the theories we see explored in
MH370: The Plane That Disappeared are outlandish, not fully formed, difficult to believe. And yet... we know something bizarre and tragic occurred." Philip Sledge of
CinemaBlend reported that "while you shouldn’t go in expecting a great deal of answers, the questions posed throughout add a level of intrigue to the mysterious story." It also said that the series rating of TV-14 differs from most true crime documentaries on Netflix due to mature themes and language. Joel Keller of
Decider said the conspiracy theories presented "are well-presented, with [investigative reporter
Jeff Wise] being the 'expert' that anchors all of those theories into some aspect of reality." It concluded "your enjoyment of this docuseries is really going to hinge on whether you bought into the theories posited by [investigative reporter] Wise, his fellow journalists and aviation experts. That’s really the only way that the viewing experience doesn’t become a frustrating rabbit hole of conspiracy theories and little else." In a
Skeptical Inquirer online review, JD Sword details the flaws in the series, and describes some of the people highlighted in the episodes as "storytellers shamelessly profiting off tragedy and pushing baseless conspiracy theories." Sword concludes that the series is not solving a mystery, but just "telling a never-ending story". ==See also==