Despite its drawbacks, in some cases it is useful: the midrange is a highly
efficient estimator of μ, given a small sample of a sufficiently
platykurtic distribution, but it is inefficient for
mesokurtic distributions, such as the normal. For example, for a
continuous uniform distribution with unknown maximum and minimum, the mid-range is the
uniformly minimum-variance unbiased estimator (UMVU) estimator for the mean. The
sample maximum and sample minimum, together with sample size, are a sufficient statistic for the population maximum and minimum – the distribution of other samples, conditional on a given maximum and minimum, is just the uniform distribution between the maximum and minimum and thus add no information. See
German tank problem for further discussion. Thus the mid-range, which is an unbiased and sufficient estimator of the population mean, is in fact the UMVU: using the sample mean just adds noise based on the uninformative distribution of points within this range. Conversely, for the normal distribution, the sample mean is the UMVU estimator of the mean. Thus for platykurtic distributions, which can often be thought of as between a uniform distribution and a normal distribution, the informativeness of the middle sample points versus the extrema values varies from "equal" for normal to "uninformative" for uniform, and for different distributions, one or the other (or some combination thereof) may be most efficient. A robust analog is the
trimean, which averages the midhinge (25% trimmed mid-range) and median.
Small samples For small sample sizes (
n from 4 to 20) drawn from a sufficiently platykurtic distribution (negative
excess kurtosis, defined as γ2 = (μ4/(μ2)²) − 3), the mid-range is an efficient estimator of the mean
μ. The following table summarizes empirical data comparing three estimators of the mean for distributions of varied kurtosis; the
modified mean is the
truncated mean, where the maximum and minimum are eliminated. For
n = 1 or 2, the midrange and the mean are equal (and coincide with the median), and are most efficient for all distributions. For
n = 3, the modified mean is the median, and instead the mean is the most efficient measure of central tendency for values of
γ2 from 2.0 to 6.0 as well as from −0.8 to 2.0. ==Sampling properties==