In the
German federal elections of 18 September 2005 (which were originally due to be held in 2006), the law appeared not to hold, since the SPD obtained 34.3% of the relevant votes while the crude steel production of the "old"
Länder (i.e. those states that belonged to the Federal Republic of Germany before reunification) in the previous year was 39.9 million
tonnes. However, an article attributed to Jakob Mierscheid, published on the
German Federal Parliament's website provided a correction to the hypothesis, to take account of the special situation. Since the elections had been brought forward, it was argued that the last months of the year should be discounted, yielding a steel production figure of 33.5 million tonnes. The graph included in the article showed a good match, thus supporting the (corrected) hypothesis. This
ad hoc hypothesis alteration might be considered an example of the
Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Following the
2005 elections, an article was published by the statistical office of the state of
Baden-Württemberg attempting to further refine the model in the form of the Mierscheid-Walla law. This article also mentions promising but inconclusive attempts to replace steel production with other measures that exhibited a degree of apparent
correlation, such as the export value of automobiles, employment levels in the field of legal advice, the price of coffee, and the number of accidents on town roads. ==See also==