Sandys first appears in the parliamentary record in 1566, when he was appointed to the committee considering the Queen’s marriage and the succession. Thereafter he became a consistently active committeeman, though not a frequent speaker. In 1571 he spoke against the severity of the vagabonds bill, describing it as “over sharp and bloody” and proposing instead that provision be made to relieve the poor within their own parishes. During the 1572 Parliament he served on committees concerning Mary, Queen of Scots and Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk, as well as a wide range of legal and administrative matters, and again intervened to argue that minstrels should be exempted from the vagabonds legislation. Throughout the 1570s and early 1580s he was repeatedly named to committees on subjects including religion, recusancy, subsidies, coinage, juries, unlawful weapons, counterfeit seals, the Scottish border, Dover harbour, the debts of Thomas Gresham and the Queen’s safety. In the Parliament of 1584–85 Sandys, who stated that he had spent “the better part of 20 years in the study of the law”, played a prominent role in legal reform and questions of parliamentary privilege. He spoke on the depletion of timber by iron mills and on general demurrers, arguing that while good pleading was honourable, clients should not pay for excessive legal subtlety. He managed a bill on demurrers through the House and was active in several privilege disputes, including the case of Arthur Hall and proceedings relating to John Croke II. His committee work in this Parliament was extensive, covering the continuation of statutes, delays in justice, recusants’ armour, ecclesiastical appeals, penal laws, Jesuits, fraudulent conveyances, roads and bridges, the subsidy and other legislative business. Sandys was less prominent in 1586–87, though he continued to serve on committees, including those relating to Mary, Queen of Scots, disputed elections, the subsidy and fraudulent conveyances; in 1588 he was among the lawyers consulted by the Privy Council on statutory reform. He resumed a more visible role in 1593, serving on the privileges and subsidy committees, speaking in the Fitzherbert privilege case, and urging stricter provisions in legislation against recusants, including Brownists, as well as involvement in poor law measures. In his final Parliament of 1597–98 no speeches are recorded, but he remained an active committeeman on matters ranging from penal laws and sturdy beggars to tillage, writs of error, charitable uses, defence and bail, sustaining his long-standing reputation for diligent service in legal and procedural affairs. He died on 22 October 1601 in
Latimer, Buckinghamshire. ==Family==