The
Court of the King's Bench, led by
Lord Mansfield (with Aston and Willes JJ concurring in judgment,
Sir Joseph Yates dissenting), sided with the publishers, finding that common law rights were not extinguished by the
Statute of Anne. Under Mansfield's ruling, the publishers had a perpetual common law right to publish a work for which they had acquired the rights. Thus, no amount of time would cause the work to pass to the public. The ruling essentially found that some works would have a perpetual term of
copyright, by holding that when the statutory rights granted by the statute expired, the publisher was still left with common law rights to the work. Although this would greatly extend the control of the rights holder this would not extinguish the
public domain since there would still be works unaffected by the ruling, and the public domain extends to unprotected elements in protected works. Millar died shortly after the ruling, and it was never appealed. As an English court, however, the court's decision did not extend to
Scotland, where a reprint industry continued to thrive. The existence of a common-law copyright, however, was later rejected by a
Scottish court in
Hinton v Donaldson. Perpetual copyright was ultimately resolved against the London publishing monopolies in the landmark case of
Donaldson v Beckett. Despite being overturned, the case of
Millar v Taylor remains an important case in the development and
history of copyright law. ==See also==