Early period From the beginning of the 18th century, when the first modern ministries were established, the powers over everything related to the countryside were vested in the
Ministry of the Interior (then called "Secretariat of State and of the Dispatch of General Development of the Realm")—although they overlapped with some that were also assigned to the
Ministry of Finance or independent agencies such us the
Council of the Mesta () or the Forest Conservancy (). The Interior Ministry acted as a catch-all agency where many areas of government were managed—including the promotion of agriculture,
plant nurseries and breeding cattle,
gardening and conservation of mountains and trees, as well as
hunting and
fishing— but most of its powers were gradually transferred to other agencies as government action became more specialized. Thus, in the middle of the 19th century, the
Ministry of Development (then called "Ministry of Trade, Public Instruction and Works") was created, which grouped together functions related to public education and those related to charity, public works and the promotion of commerce. Although it was not initially planned that this new agency would take on agricultural affairs, a few weeks later it was decided to do so, removing his charitable powers, which remained in the Interior Ministry. The agriculture responsibilities remained in the Ministry of Development for nearly one hundred years, always with the organic level of directorate-general. As happened with the Ministry of the Interior, development gave rise to new departments, such as
Public Instruction and Fine Arts (1900),
Labour (1920) or
National Economy (1928). Specifically, in this last split, the Ministry of National Economy —today the Ministry of Industry and Tourism— assumed the Directorate-General for Agriculture, with the agricultural chambers, the Agronomic Council and the association of livestock farmers and the services of Hygiene and Livestock Health. This new department evolved rapidly, and shortly thereafter, by Decree of 16 December 1931 of the
President of the Republic,
Niceto Alcalá Zamora, it was renamed "Ministry of Agriculture, Industry and Trade" and grouped together the directorates-general of Agriculture, Industry and Trade that it already had as well as those relating to mines, forestry, fishing and livestock of the Ministry of Development.
The importance of agriculture: specific ministry The importance of the economic area and the important role played by the primary sector in the
Spanish economy at the beginning of the 20th century—the population dedicated to agriculture accounted for nearly 50% of the total active population— was evident from the beginning, since as early as 1900 the term "Agriculture" began to appear in the names of some government departments such as the ministries of Development or Industry. The decisive point was reached in 1933. In June, under the premiership of
Manuel Azaña, the
Ministry of Agriculture, Industry and Trade was divided into two; on the one hand, the powers over industry and trade were kept together, and on the other, for the first time, a department was created exclusively dedicated to agricultural issues. The separation became final, except in the period from 25 September 1935 to 19 February 1936, when it was briefly merged again the responsibilities of industry and trade.
Agrarian reforms of 1932 and 1935 During this Republican period, the new department had to follow the work of its predecessor and find a solution to what was considered the main problem in the rural world:
latifundism. This problem was mainly in southern Spain, where there were large landowners who monopolized land ownership, such as President Alcalá-Zamora, who opposed some proposals. A year before the foundation of the Ministry, the
Cortes had approved the Agrarian Reform Act, promoted by the minister
Marcelino Domingo. This law established a policy of expropriations with compensation for the owners of large estates—except for the
Grandees of Spain, which were punished for with expropriations without compensation—with the aim of converting the land into smallholdings that could be distributed among the day labourers and thus improve both the conditions of the workers and the productivity of the land. It was done through two mechanisms: peasants settled by decrees of intensification of crops (temporary occupation) and peasants settled by the Agrarian Reform Act (expropriation of lands to the Grandees). After the
1933 general election, only the first of these was used. Although this could be blamed on the conservatives who, on many occasions, tried—unsuccessfully due to the balance of forces—to overturn proposals that sought to intensify crops or expropriate land, the reality is that the main problem was the complexity of the norm and respect for the procedure, which required that each case be treated individually. Knowing this, the IRA was flooded with appeals from the landowners, which ended up greatly delaying their work.
Republican policy reversal and colonization If the agrarian policy was already damaged, the
civil war and the victory of the rebel side meant its total failure. The rebel government immediately created the Agricultural Recovery Service which, together with the National Service for Economic and Social Land Reform, had as its main objectives the reversal of the measures of the previous Republican policy, Precisely, from this last service the
National Institute for Colonization (INC) was created in October 1939. The INC was responsible for implementing, in a similar way to the IRA and with the same little success, the measures established in the Law on the Basis for the Colonization of Large Areas of 1939. This law established a new agricultural policy based on the increase in agricultural production thanks to the expansion of
irrigation, the cultivation of areas not previously exploited for agriculture and, thanks to the previous measures, the settlement of new "settlers". From then on, this organization devoted itself to buying large tracts of land to create new towns where these settlers could settle and prosper. From 1945 onwards, legal adjustments were made to avoid the paralysis of the Institute as a consequence of the lack of available productive land and the high cost that the organization would have to carry out its projects on the lands that the owners ceded to it, which were mostly unproductive. For this reason, in mid-1981 the department was renamed "Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries". The changes did not stop there; that same year, the
Congress of Deputies urged the Government to create, before the end of the year, a Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to "facilitate a unitary administrative treatment of the production, transformation and distribution of food products". In compliance with this mandate, another redistribution of powers was carried out in December 1981, which transferred to the Ministry the powers in food matters exercised by the Ministries of
Industry and Energy and
Economy and Trade. In the following years, due to the creation of the
autonomous communities and the decentralisation of powers over the areas of action of the ministry and the new European policies, its autonomous agencies will undergo important changes, most being suppressed and others transformed. Thus, in 1985, six organizations were eliminated, namely: the National Institute for Denominations of Origin, the Institute for Agrarian, Fisheries and Food Studies, the Pest Defense and Phytopathological Inspection Service, the Livestock Development Agency, the Board for the Promotion of Maritime-Fisheries Vocational Training, and the Grain Deposits Service. Exceptionally, in 1987 the Olive Oil Agency was created and, in 1991, the National Institute for Seeds and Nursery Plants, the Agricultural Extension Service and the National Tobacco Agency were abolished. In 1995, two other major reforms took place. The first merged IRYDA and INCONA to create the
National Parks Autonomous Agency (OAPN). The Institute for the Promotion of Agricultural Associations (IFA) was also abolished and its functions being shared among the ministry's administrative agencies. The second merged FORPPA and SENPA to form the
Spanish Agricultural Guarantee Fund (FEGA). The 2000s began with the establishment of a main structure that will remain stable to this day, around the traditional Undersecretariat—charged with running the department on a day-to-day basis—and two general secretariats (one for Agriculture and Food and the other for Fisheries). During the
premiership of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, in 2008, the
Ministry of Environment was merged into the Ministry of Agriculture, which was renamed "Ministry of Environment and Rural and Marine Affairs". Nature conservation affairs thus returned to this portfolio after 20 years independently. Some agrarian associations, such as the Young Farmers' Agricultural Association (Asaja), rejected the rebranding of the Agriculture Ministry, considering that it was "to ignore two of the main challenges facing society today: agriculture and food" as well as "downplay the importance of the agricultural sector". With a new government in power for the 2011–2015 legislative period, the department retained its environmental powers through the Secretary of State for Environment and, roughly speaking, recovered the rest of the structure established in 2000. In this new stage, which will last almost seven years, the department was first called the "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment" and then the "Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment". Following the
2018 vote of no confidence in the government of Mariano Rajoy and the formation of the
first government of Pedro Sánchez, the Ministry of the Environment was re-established as "Ministry for the Ecological Transition" and this department recovered the traditional name of "Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food".
Food Chain Act: fair prices When
Miguel Arias Cañete was minister, the Government promoted two laws approved in the summer of 2013. The first one had the objective of promoting cooperativism in the agro-food industry to group together the "first links that make up the food chain", thus promoting their "competitiveness and contributing to the valorisation of their productions" and achieving an "improvement in the income of agricultural producers". As for the second, among its many aims —from introducing new technologies in the sector to improving information and transparency—the objective of trying to reduce the imbalance between the different operators in the value chain stood out. To monitor and ensure compliance with the purposes of this law, in 2014 the Olive Oil Agency extended its powers to other markets outside of olive oil and it was renamed as the
Food Information and Control Agency (AICA). The ambitious goal of achieving a balance in the food chain was not achieved and the situation was aggravated by the context of the
COVID-19 pandemic, which generated unrest in the rural world due to the inability to cover expenses while the last actors in the chain had prices that allowed them large profits. Following a series of protests between 2020 and 2021, minister
Luis Planas promoted a series of reforms to the Food Chain Act that made it mandatory to set a price that covered producers' expenses, greater publicity for those sanctioned for non-compliance, and the creation of a registry of food contracts, while strengthening the AICA, which saw its budget increase by almost 32%, as well as its control and sanction powers. In 2020, the ministry lost its powers on
forestry in favour of the environmental ministry. At the end of 2023, a Secretariat of State for Agriculture and Food was created for the first time. ==Organization==