Raising income limit In 2016, then-state Senator
Tony Lourey (DFL–Kerrick) and State Representative
Jennifer Schultz (DFL–Duluth) proposed increasing the income limit for MinnesotaCare eligibility from 200% FPG to 275% FPG. This change would have raised the annual income limit for a family of four from $48,600 to $66,825 under 2016 guidelines. During the 2017 State of the State, DFL Governor
Mark Dayton proposed expanding the eligibility limit for MinnesotaCare to 400% FPG. This change would have allowed families of four earning up to $98,400 under 2017 guidelines to purchase MinnesotaCare coverage for an undetermined premium.
"Buy in" proposal In 2016, the DFL-controlled
Minnesota Senate passed legislation to begin the process of allowing Minnesotans with incomes exceeding the limit for traditional MinnesotaCare to "buy in" to MinnesotaCare coverage. The 2016 legislation authorized the state to seek federal waivers necessary to allow the program to operate. Operational costs for the program and per member per month premium prices were not disclosed at that time. The proposal did not become law. With the support of DFL Governor Mark Dayton, DFL legislators introduced a similar proposal in 2017. In 2018, the Dayton administration estimated the average statewide cost of MinnesotaCare buy-in to be $659 per person per month, or $7,908 per year, for a silver level health plan. Silver level plans generally qualify as high deductible health plans, with individual deductibles exceeding $3,000 and family deductibles exceeding $11,000. In comparison, for 2018, the
Kaiser Family Foundation estimated the average cost of a privately sold silver level health plan to be $326 per person per month, or $3,912 per year, with similar deductibles. To start the buy in program, Governor Dayton proposed spending roughly $100,000,000 in public funding for a financial reserve to back up the government-run insurance option. Dayton's term as governor expired in January 2019, but his successor, Governor Walz, continues to support a buy-in option for MinnesotaCare and supported it in his 2018 gubernatorial campaign. Critics have expressed three primary concerns about the viability of a MinnesotaCare buy-in. They argue low healthcare provider reimbursement rates set by the government for MinnesotaCare will result in few providers accepting patients with public option coverage. Were providers mandated to accept public option coverage, they argue rural hospitals and clinics would be driven to bankruptcy. Critics have also questioned the feasibility of modifying the state-run MNsure marketplace to sell the buy-in plan due to MNsure's technological deficiencies. In addition, critics question the affordability of a buy-in based on the Dayton administration's premium estimate, which is more than double current premiums for comparable value plans in the private market. ==References==