Critical response The series has received critical acclaim, with some praising it as one of the best new series of 2022. For the first season, the
review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes reported a 95% approval rating based on 58 critic reviews. The website's critics consensus reads, "
The Rehearsal gives Nathan Fielder carte blanche to take his absurdist comedy to the limit, which he pushes even further past with deadpan aplomb in what might be his most uncomfortably funny feat yet."
Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned a score of 86 out of 100 based on 23 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".
The Rehearsal appeared in the top ten on numerous publications' "Best of 2022" lists, including first for
IndieWire,
The Ringer, and
ScreenCrush, among others. For the second season, Rotten Tomatoes reported a 98% approval rating based on 45 critic reviews. The website's critics consensus reads, "Never fear, Nathan Fielder is here to solve air travel safety and further his frustrated quest for human connection in a second
Rehearsal that's just as audacious, cringey, and uproariously funny as the first." Metacritic assigned a score of 88 out of 100 based on 22 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".
Voxs Alissa Wilkinson likewise called the show "an excellent reminder that we know much less about others than we think we do," and compared it to the writings of
Leslie Jamison and
Martin Buber. The show's blurring of simulation and reality have drawn comparisons to the
Charlie Kaufman film
Synecdoche, New York and the
Tom McCarthy novel
Remainder. The series has been described as a
spiritual successor to
Nathan for You, since both shows share a premise of Fielder helping average people in humorous ways.
Vulture described Fielder's "willingness to screw with people" and put them in situations that might embarrass them or cause them to do things that are out of character being the core thread of his work. However, Brody embraced moments in season 2 as achieving true artistic excellence. Many critics viewed the show as a critique of the exploitive and disingenuous nature of reality television, with writer Israel Daramola of
Los Angeles Review of Books calling it "a commentary on...the inherent phoniness of reality television as well as the faults and constrictions of acting as representation of real life." The series' central idea of rehearsing and performing social interactions resonated with many autistic viewers, who viewed it as an analogy for
masking.
Variety writer Daniel D'Addario highlighted the series' ultimate message that "all of us are performing, all the time."
Accolades == References ==