Cates was described as a "radical
traditionalist" who felt that conservatism has become unnecessarily embittered, and that there is "too much whinging on the right".
Brexit Before entering Parliament, Cates had supported the UK remaining a member of the
European Union in the
2016 referendum but, during the election campaign, said she had since changed her mind and supported
Brexit. In a plenary session of the 2023 National Conservatism Conference, Cates was quoted saying:"I don't care if you're a
Red Tory, a
communitarian, a follower of
Burke, or, heaven forbid, a
libertarian free marketeer. None of these traditions has a future, none of our philosophical musings or policy proposals will amount to anything long-lasting unless we address the one overarching threat to
British conservatism, and indeed the whole of Western society. No, it's not
climate change. It's not
Russia or
China or
Iran. It's not the
neo-Marxist ideology that has so weakened our institutions. It's not inflation or taxation or poor productivity. No. There is one critical outcome that
liberal individualism has completely failed to deliver and that is babies." During the
COVID-19 pandemic Cates argued the policy emphasis should have been on "the long-term impact of lockdowns on young people's lives." In a speech at the
Alliance for Responsible Citizenship's inaugural conference, she criticised the way "our GDP-obsessed economic system demands that even mothers of small children leave their infants in daycare to return to the workplace."
Conversion therapy Cates has claimed that she does not support, and never has supported,
conversion therapy; however, she has voted against some versions of legislation that oppose it.
National conservatism Cates served on the advisory board of the
Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, a group dedicated to cultural renewal in western nations. In May 2023, at the
National Conservatism Conference, Cates commented that she felt that Western society was threatened by
Cultural Marxism and referenced the
Great Replacement conspiracy theory by stating that falling birth rates are "the one overarching threat to British conservatism and indeed the whole of western society". Cates later stated in an interview in June 2023 that she uses the term as a catch-all pseudonym for "bad liberal ideology". In August 2023, Cates called for the UK to leave the
European Convention on Human Rights if the
Supreme Court finds the
Rwanda policy incompatible with European law. Cates argues that UK
equalities legislation has become a threat to freedoms of speech, expression, religion, and association and that the UK's
common law heritage provides a strong human rights record, even without the ECHR. Cates argued for the nation to be resolved to use the power of the state to address the needs of voters who feel ignored and disrespected whilst also aiming to keep faith with Brexit voters. She warned that trans advocating charities
Stonewall and
Mermaids taught "dangerous and contested extreme ideologies that don't have a basis in science". In one speech, she offered anecdotal observation that, for some men, "trans porn that led them into the trans arena." In 30 June 2022, during a debate surrounding relationship and sex education in the UK, Cates claimed that knowing about transgender identities could be damaging to children. She shared a story from
Bayswater Support Group, of a 15 year old child with
Asperger syndrome who began identifying as transgender. Their mother was unsupportive, but the school supported the child's new gender identity. Cates referenced the group name, stating that Bayswater had reported a surge of parents contacting them after their children learnt about transgender people at school.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism approached Cates, asking for comment on her connection to Bayswater Support Group, after their investigation found that the group members encouraged sending their children to conversion therapy, and destroying their children's belongings. A spokesperson for Cates claimed the investigation included factual errors, and was "contrary to publicly available evidence". The spokesperson refused to provide any further specific comments, and threatened The Bureau of Investigative Journalism with legal action. == Post-politics ==