Supply chain The draft bill included no measures to counter the use of slave labour abroad as the Home Office believed that asking businesses to audit and report on modern slavery in their supply chains would be an "additional burden". However, campaigning resulted in a supply chain clause being added to the bills so that "big business will be forced to make public its efforts to stop the use of slave labour by its suppliers". Consultation regarding the reporting requirements of the supply chain clause took place during February and March 2015. From 29 October 2015 the
Transparency in Supply Chain Provisions require businesses to publish an annual statement if they have an annual turnover above a threshold (£36 million). The statement must confirm the steps taken to ensure that slavery and human trafficking are not taking place in the business (or in any supply chain) or declare that no steps to confirm the existence of slavery or trafficking have been taken. It is expected that few businesses would take the latter option as it may place their ethical position into question and affect their reputation. There are, however, no legally binding requirements to conduct due diligence on supply chains and there are no criminal or financial penalties for non-compliance. On 21 March 2016 the Home Office held a
Transparency in Supply Chains (TISC) event where an independent civil society modern slavery register, the TISC Report, was announced in order to provide a publicly searchable, accessible registry for companies to share their statements. At the point of launch, on 1 April 2016, the organization, which was founded by
Jaya Chakrabarti, was partnered with, amongst others, the
Welsh Government, the
Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, the
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and
Business West. On 31 January 2017 it had 10,153 companies with statements held within its open data register, making it the largest modern slavery statement register globally. the register reports that its database includes over 60,000 modern slavery statements. In 2019 the UK Government committed on a voluntary basis to publishing a Modern Slavery Statement of its own, reflecting the requirements imposed on larger businesses under section 54 of the 2015 Act. The statement was published on 26 March 2020. An updated statement was issued in September 2023. The Welsh Government published a Modern Slavery Statement on 10 August 2023. Scotland's first
Trafficking and Exploitation Strategy was published in 2017 and the
Scottish Government published a statement covering "slavery and human trafficking" on 12 December 2023.
Prostitution In November 2014
Fiona Mactaggart MP added an amendment to the bill concerning
prostitution, aimed at criminalising the purchase of sex. In the bill's debate in the
House of Commons,
John McDonnell MP argued against the amendment. He highlighted the lack of evidence for any correlation between the
Swedish sex purchase ban and a reduction in numbers of
sex workers or their clients, and cited findings "that not only do such measures not work, they actually cause harm". McDonnell quoted Reverend Andrew Dotchin, a founding member of the
Safety First Coalition: "I strongly oppose clauses on prostitution in the Modern Slavery Bill, which would make the purchase of sex illegal. Criminalising clients does not stop prostitution, nor does it stop the criminalisation of women. It drives prostitution further underground, making it more dangerous and
stigmatising for women." The amendment was subsequently dropped.
Tied visas In March 2015 an amendment was brought forward in the
House of Lords concerning migrant workers who are brought to the UK by their employer using "tied visas". These workers are typically foreign domestic workers and they are not allowed to legally leave their job and find employment elsewhere. The system of tied visas, introduced in 2012, has been compared to the
kafala system of employer-sponsored workers used in some
Middle East countries. The amendment would have given workers in the UK using tied visas the right to change employer, but it was rejected by the
House of Commons. == Criticism of the bill ==