Critical response The film received mostly positive reviews from critics, although some noted it as a step down from its predecessor. On review aggregation website
Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 69% based on 156 reviews with an average rating of 6.2/10.
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gives the film three and a half out of four stars, describing the film as a step down from
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, but only because the first film was so "fresh and unexpected".
A. O. Scott of
The New York Times praises Rapace's performance, stating, "tiny and agile, her steely rage showing now and then the tiniest crack of vulnerability, belongs to another dimension altogether. She makes this movie good enough, but also makes you wish it were much better." Lisa Kennedy of
The Denver Post describes Lisbeth Salander as "worth the trouble" and having a "cold stare" the like of which has not been seen since "
Clint was roaming the Italian hillsides." She notes the film uses the linked themes of bureaucratic corruption and misogyny, where the previous film linked misogyny with
fascism. The review contrasts the violence against women and heroism of
Fire with the violence of
The Killer Inside Me, complaining that the latter gives in to the worst impulses, noting that only the former story "works,” as some redemption is provided through revenge.
Michael Phillips of the
Chicago Tribune writes that the film is much the same as its predecessor, despite the new director (Daniel Alfredson) and screenwriter (Jonas Frykberg), and is likely to please those who enjoyed the first film. He observes that Rapace remains the chief asset of the series, and that she works well with
Michael Nyqvist, whom he likens to a more sincere, Swedish version of
Larry Hagman. He writes further that even though Rapace and Nyqvist "could not be better" in their roles, the film should acknowledge the middle ground between the righteous heroes and the evil villains in order to work better as cinematic
pulp fiction.
Peter Travers of
Rolling Stone gives the film 3 out of 4 stars. Rick Groen of
The Globe and Mail describes the film as "Tepid and downright confusing" for those who have not read the books, although he suspects there are few who have not; he notes that the plot, "already thick on the page, often seems impenetrable here." Although he concedes the plot generates some suspense, he complains it more often results in confusion but hopes the final film in the trilogy will bring greater clarity.
Box office Prior to its release in the United States, the film had already earned $51,259,526 at the international box office. During its first week of release in the United States, it grossed $904,998, being released in three times as many theaters as the first film and grossing three times as much. The film has a worldwide gross of $67,126,795. ==References==