The ethnic name of the Balkan Μοισοί
Moesi, as well as of the Anatolian Μυσοί
Mysoi, seems to be based on the root
Masa, from the
Paleo-Balkan word for 'horse',
*me(n)za-; also the ethnic name
Muška seems to be a suffixal derivative holding some kind of semantic distinction from the original root. They have been connected with the
Albanian word for '
mule'
mushk(ë) (virtually identical to
Muška/i),
Romanian muşcoiu and
Aromanian musca, as well as in almost all
Slavic languages (cf.
Old Church Slavonic мьзгъ or мьскъ,
Serbo-Croatian mazak or
maz(a)g,
Old Czech mesh,
mzha,
mezek,
mezk '
hinny',
Old Russian москъ, мъскъ or мьскъ etc.). The root is generally considered to have originated in the Balkans and thereafter spreading into the Slavic zone. Already in the 19th century German linguist
Gustav Meyer suggested a link between
Μυσοί and Albanian
mushk. He perceived
mushk as a suffixal formation
*mus-k-o-, noting the phonetic similarity between the terms. Furthermore, he provided the evidence of a fragment written by
Anacreon mentioning the
Mysians of Anatolia as 'inventors' of the
interbreeding between
jacks and
mares. Also according to Mayer the northern parts of
Anatolia might have been the homeland of the mules. A connection of Mysians with mules is also present already in
Homer's
Iliad. Further relevant
Paleo-Balkan evidence can be seen in
Iuppiter Menzanas, mentioned in a passage written by
Festus in relation to a
Messapian horse sacrifice, and in
ΜΕΖΗΝΑ̣Ι from a
Thracian inscription on the
Duvanli gold ring also bearing the image of a horseman. Both these attestations might indicate that
*me(n)zana- means 'horseman' and consequently that the root
*me(n)za- means '
horse'. The term has been further compared with Albanian
mëz or
mâz '
foal', which also finds a correlation with Romanian
mînz. The province of
Moesia was named after the name
Moesi.
Ancient literature in 250 AD, divided into the provinces of Moesia Superior to the west and Moesia Inferior to the east In the late 1st century BCE, in Rome a new ideological discourse was formed. Propagated by poets like
Horace and
Ovid, it constructed a glorious
Trojan past for the Romans, who were claimed to be descendants of Trojan
Dardanians. In the years before the Trojan origin story became the official Roman narrative about their origins, the Romans came into conflict in the Balkans with a people who were known as the
Dardani. In public discourse this created the problem that the Roman army could be seen as fighting against a people who could be related to the ancestors of the Romans. The image of the historical Dardani in the 1st century BC was that of Illyrian barbarians who raided their Macedonian frontier and had to be dealt with. In this context, the name of a people known as the
Moesi appeared in Roman sources. The
Moesi are mentioned only in three ancient sources in the period after the death of Emperor Augustus in 14 CE. The name itself was taken from the name of the
Mysians in Asia Minor. The choice seems to be related to the fact that the Trojan-era Mysians lived close to the Trojan-era Dardanians.
Ovid mentions the Moesi as a people who raided the inner Balkan provinces of Romans.
Strabo is the first who linked the Balkan
Moesi considering them to be of the same origin as the
Homeric
Mysi of northwest
Anatolia. Strabo constructs a story according to which Moesian presence in the Danubian area dates to the campaigns of
Aelius Catus, who moved 50.000 Moesians from coastal Thrace near the
Getae around 4 CE. Strabo's argumentation that the Moesi were moved in the region by Aelius Catus has been criticized for its "illogical and controversial arguments". Strabo in Geography mentions no historical events in relation to the Moesi in contrast to the historical details he reports about the
Getae and the
Triballi who would have been their neighbours. This is seen as more evidence that the Moesi as a people were in fact a recent construct. As the name of the
Dardani in Roman discourse became linked to the ancestors of the Romans, the actual Dardani began to be covered in Roman literature by other names. After the death of Augustus, their name in connection to the Balkans became a political problem. After the death of Augustus, the new emperor was
Tiberius, his stepson and the most senior Roman general in the Balkans. As Tiberius had played a key role in the Roman conquest of the Balkans, as emperor he could not be portrayed as the conqueror of
Dardanians, whose name had been constructed as the name of the mythical progenitors of the Romans. Thus, the decision to create a new name for Dardania and the Dardani was made. Despite this decision and the administrative use of the names
Moesia and
Moesi for the
Dardani and
Dardania, the original use of the name persisted by authors like
Appian. the Byzantines usually called the
Bulgarians Moesi, and their lands,
Moesia. Byzantine official and historian
Niketas Choniates (c. 1155 – 1217) wrote that the barbarians of the
Haemus region, formerly known as Moesians, were now known as
Vlachs. Byzantine
eastern orthodox priest and judge
Demetrios Chomatenos (c. 1216 - 1236) wrote the following:
"This great father of ours and a luminary of Bulgaria was descended from the European Moesi whom the people usually know as Bulgarians. They were displaced in old times by the military force of Alexander the Great, from the situated near Brusa mount Olympus, to the Northern Ocean and the Dead Sea, and after a long time had passed, they crossed the Danube with a formidable army, and took possession of all the neighbouring provinces of Pannonia, Dalmatia, Thrace and Illyricum, and a great part of Macedonia and Thessaly." == See also ==