Canis chanco was the
scientific name proposed by
John Edward Gray in 1863 who described a skin of a wolf that was shot in
Chinese Tartary. This specimen was classified as a wolf
subspecies Canis lupus chanco by
St. George Jackson Mivart in 1880. In 1923, Japanese zoologist
Yoshio Abe proposed separating the wolves of the Korean Peninsula from
C. chanco as a separate species,
C. coreanus, because of their comparatively narrower muzzle. This distinction was contested by
Reginald Pocock, who dismissed it as a local variant of
C. chanco. In the third edition of
Mammal Species of the World published in 2005, the mammalogist W. Christopher Wozencraft listed under the wolf
Canis lupus the
taxonomic synonyms for the subspecies
Canis lupus chanco. Wozencraft classified
C. coreanus (Abe, 1923) as one of its synonyms. There remains taxonomic confusion over the Mongolian wolf. In 1941, Pocock had referred to the
Tibetan wolf as
C. l. laniger and classified it as a synonym under
C. l. chanco. However, Wozencraft included
C. l. laniger as a synonym for
C. l. filchneri Matschie (1907). There are some researchers who still refer to Pocock's classification of the Tibetan wolf as
C. l. chanco, which has caused taxonomic confusion. The
NCBI/
Genbank lists
C. l. chanco as the Mongolian wolf but
C. l. laniger as the Tibetan wolf, and there are academic works that refer to
C. l. chanco as the Mongolian wolf. To add further confusion, in 2019, a workshop hosted by the
IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group noted that the
Himalayan wolf's distribution included the Himalayan range and the Tibetan Plateau. The group recommends that this wolf lineage be known as the "Himalayan wolf" and classified as
Canis lupus chanco until a genetic analysis of the
holotypes is available. The Himalayan wolf currently lacks a proper morphological analysis. ==Morphological description==