Amongst those who have argued that the
Monita are a hoax are Bishop Lipski of Cracow (1616), in his
Jesuiten Fablen, Fra
Paolo Sarpi, the historian of the
Council of Trent and
Antoine Arnauld and the "Nouvelles Ecclesiastiques"; plus anti-Jesuits such as the
Jansenists Henri de Saint-Ignace and
Blaise Pascal, von Lang,
Johann Joseph Ignaz von Döllinger, Friedrich (the author of Janus), Huber, and Reusch, as well as the Protestant historian
Johann Karl Ludwig Gieseler. In the
British House of Commons, during the debates on
Catholic Emancipation, the fraudulent character of the
Monita was acknowledged by more than one speaker, while the authorities of the
British Museum and likewise the French bibliographer M. Barbier, agree in describing the work as "apocryphal". Anglican Bishop of London
Henry Compton was strongly opposed to Roman Catholicism, and in 1669 published an English translation of
The Secret Instructions. A defense was offered by
Richard Frederick Littledale, opponent to Roman Catholicism, in his article "Jesuits", in the
Encyclopædia Britannica of 1881. He claimed that the work is "both caricature and libel", but pleaded nevertheless that it was substantially true, since its author, "a shrewd and keen observer", having noticed how Jesuits actually worked, deduced from his observations the rules by which they were guided. As against this case,
John Gerard, writing in the
Catholic Encyclopedia denies the authorship arguing that the official rules and constitutions of the Jesuits contradict these supposed instructions, for they expressly prohibit the acceptance of ecclesiastical dignities by its subjects, unless compelled by papal authority, and from the days of the founder,
St. Ignatius Loyola, the Society has impeded such promotion. Gerard also argues that in many cases, genuine private instructions from the Jesuit general to subordinate superiors have fallen into hostile hands, which in many cases are found to give instructions directly contrary to those in the
Monita. ==References==