Criticism from feminists The Vagina Monologues has been criticized by some within the feminist movement, including
pro-sex feminists and
individualist feminists. Sex-positive feminist
Betty Dodson, author of several books about female sexuality, saw the play as having a narrow and restrictive view of sexuality. Dodson's main concern seemed to be the lack of the term "clitoris" throughout the play. She believes that the play sends a message that the vagina is the main sex organ, not the clitoris. There is also criticism of
The Vagina Monologues about its conflation of vaginas with women, more specifically for the message of the play that women are their vaginas, as Susan E. Bell and Susan M. Reverby argue, "Generations of feminists have argued that we are more than our bodies, more than a vagina or 'the sex'. Yet, TVM re-inscribes women's politics in our bodies, indeed in our vaginas alone." The focus on women finding themselves through their vaginas, many say, seems more like a Second Wave consciousness-raising group rather than a ground-breaking, inter-sectional, Third Wave cornerstone. Although members of American University's Women's Initiative believe that the show
was revolutionary in the 1990s, they concluded that equating having a vagina with being a woman is not an accurate display of womanhood in the 2010s, suggesting that
The Vagina Monologues continues to perpetuate the
gender binary and erase the identity of those who are
genderqueer.
Criticism for being colonial Kim Hall, a professor of philosophy at Appalachian State University, further criticizes the play, particularly the sections dealing with women in
developing countries, for contributing to "colonialist conceptions of non-Western women", such as the piece "My Vagina Was My Village." Although she supports frank discussions about sex, Hall rescales many of the same critiques leveled by feminists of color at "
White privilege" among
second-wave feminists: "premature white feminist assumptions and celebrations of a global 'sisterhood.'" In 2013,
Columbia University's V-Day decided to stage the play with a cast entirely of non-White women. That decision, too, was controversial.
Social conservative criticism The play has also been criticized by
social conservatives, such as the
American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) and the
Network of Enlightened Women. The TFP denounced it as "a piece replete with sexual encounters, lust, graphic descriptions of masturbation and
lesbian behavior", urging students and parents to protest. Following TFP and other protests, performances were cancelled at sixteen
Catholic colleges.
Saint Louis University made the decision not to endorse the 2007 production, claiming the yearly event was getting to be "redundant". The response of the university's student-led feminist organization was to continue the production at an off-campus location.
Robert Swope ('good rape') critique In 2000, Robert Swope, a conservative contributor to a
Georgetown University newspaper,
The Hoya, wrote an article critical of the play. He suggested there was a contradiction between the promotion of rape awareness on V-Day and the monologue "The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could", in which an adult woman recalls that being given alcohol and
statutorily raped at 13 by a 24-year-old woman was a positive, healing experience, ending the segment with the proclamation "It was a good rape." Outcry from the play's supporters resulted in Swope being fired from the staff of
The Hoya, before the piece was even run. Swope had previously criticized the play in an article he wrote entitled "Georgetown Women's Center: Indispensable Asset or Improper Expenditure?" His termination received critical
editorial coverage in
The Wall Street Journal,
Salon,
National Review,
The Atlantic Monthly,
The Washington Times,
The Weekly Standard, and by
Wendy McElroy of
iFeminists. The controversy resulted in the script being modified in 2008 to change the age of the statutorily raped girl from 13 to 16 and to remove the "good rape" line. == College performances ==