Critical response Janet Maslin of
The New York Times wrote, "Though Mr. Mazursky's new
Moon Over Parador has the makings of a clever satire, it never gets beyond the fond, gentle mood of an amusing travelogue." She also noted, "The film's jokes about actors are affectionate, but its
political satire is notably weak. […] The film's closing turn of events, which has the potential to be quite diabolical, is one of many comic opportunities that Mr. Mazursky, very uncharacteristically, lets slip away."
Hal Hinson of
The Washington Post stated, "
Moon Over Parador wants to be a political satire, but it has more to say about Broadway and Hollywood than about
totalitarian dictatorships" and "The political situations in the film are too generic, and too facile, to have any resonance. As a result, the film's satire appears toothless and its politics, in general, a fashionable pose. In
Moon Over Parador, Mazursky is shrewd about the superficiality of show people without realizing that he has left himself open to the same charge." The staff at
Variety wrote, "Mazursky's elaborate farce about the actor as imposter has moments of true hilarity emerging only fitfully from a ponderous production" and "Dreyfuss' panache carries the film most of the way, ably played off Braga's lusty and character."
Accolades ==See also==